期刊文献+

生物共振与血清sIgE检测过敏原对比分析 被引量:8

Comparative analysis of Bioresonance and serum specific IgE for allergen testing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨生物共振过敏原检测仪在变态反应性疾病中的临床应用价值。方法采用德国百康生物共振检测仪及UniCAP自动体外过敏原检测系统,对533例变态反应性疾病患者进行过敏原检测,对比两种检测方法的相关性。结果533例患者中,生物共振法过敏原阳性检出率为71%,血清sIgE检测过敏原阳性检出率为43%。对两种方法检测结果进行分类/组比较:除豚草和鱼类外,余5类/组过敏原组间比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。生物共振检测与血清sIgE检测的符合率在47%~83%之间,其中尘螨、花生的符合率较低分别为52%和47%,其他过敏原的符合率均在69%以上。结论生物共振与血清sIgE检测过敏原具有一定的符合性,蒿草、豚草、尘螨是本地区常见的过敏原。 Objective To evaluate the clinical values of the Bioresonance in allergic disease. Methods 533 cases of allergic patients were detected with Germany BICOM detector and UniCAP automatically in vitro allergen detection system, the correlation of two kinds test were contrasted. Results 533 cases of allergic patients,the total positive rate of allergen test was 71% with BICOM and 43% by serum specific sIgE test.There was no statistically significant difference of the positive rate in common allergen between BICOM and sIgE test except ragweed and fish(P 〉 0.05). Grouping comparison with testing results of two methods: Bioresonance coincidence rate is between 47%-83% and its relationship with the sIgE test are in line with the rate at more than 69% except dust mite and peanut 52% and 47% respectively. Conclusion Bioresonance test has certain conformity of serum specific IgE test. Artemisia, ragweed ,dust mite in this region are common allergen.
出处 《中国医药科学》 2014年第1期24-26,36,共4页 China Medicine And Pharmacy
关键词 生物共振 变态反应性疾病 过敏原 血清sIgE检测 Bioresonance Allergic disease Allergen Serum specific IgE test
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献18

  • 1王亚平,尉莉.80例过敏性疾病患者的过敏原调查[J].中国麻风皮肤病杂志,2005,21(12):995-996. 被引量:4
  • 2黄进波,陈升豪,方小娴.830例过敏性皮肤病血清总IgE和过敏原特异性IgE检测报告[J].实用医技杂志,2006,13(3):355-356. 被引量:8
  • 3韩晗,李孟荣,陈小芳,李昌崇,罗运春,董琳,蔡晓红.温州地区儿童血清特异性过敏原检测的临床意义[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2006,21(9):532-533. 被引量:42
  • 4Li J, Sun B, Huang Y, et al. A muhicentre study assessing the prevalence of sensitizations in patients with asthma and/or rhinitis in China. Allergy, 2009,64 : 1083-1092.
  • 5Chong LK, Ong MJ, Curtin-Brosnan J, et al. Skin test sensitivity to mouse predicts allergic symptoms to nasal challenge in urban adults. Allergy Asthma Proc, 2010,31:472-476.
  • 6Oppenheimer J, Nelson HS. Skin testing: a survey of allergists. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 2006,96 : 19-23.
  • 7Bousquet PJ,Chatzi L, Jarvis D, et al. Assessing skin prick tests reliability in ECRHS. Allergy, 2008,63:341-346.
  • 8Fernandez C, Bevilacqua E, Fernandez N, et al. Asthma related to altemaria sensitization: an analysis of skin-test and serum- specific IgE efficiency based on the bronchial provocation test.Clin Exp Allergy, 2011,41:649-656.
  • 9van Kampen V, Rabstein S, Sander I, et al. Prediction of challenge test results by flour-specific IgE and skin prick test in symptomatic bakers. Allergy, 2008,63 : 897-902.
  • 10Kersten W. Comparison of the Allergyscreen (MEDIWISS Analytic, Moers ) with the Skin Test ( HAL, Dtisseldorf-in-vivo ) and the CAP-System ( Phannacia, Freibnrg-in-vitro). Allergologie,2002,25 : 203-208.

共引文献31

同被引文献52

引证文献8

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部