摘要
This study examined the adhesive strength of two self-adhesive methacrylate resin-based sealers（MetaSEAL and RealSeal SE） to root dentin and compared them with RealSeal and AH Plus in properties. A total of 48 extracted human single-rooted teeth were used to prepare the 0.9-mm thick longitudinal tooth slice（each per tooth）. Standardized simulated canal spaces of uniform dimensions were prepared in the middle of radicular dentin. After treated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite（NaOCl） and 17% EDTA, tooth slices were allocated randomly to four groups（n=12） in terms of different sealers used： MetaSEAL, RealSeal SE, RealSeal, and AH plus groups. The simulated canal spaces were obturated with different sealers in each group. There were 10 slabs with 20 simulated canal spaces（n=20） used in each group for push-out testing. The failure modes and the ultrastructures of fractured sealer-dentin interfaces were examined. The remaining 2 slabs in each group underwent partial demineralization for observation of the ultrastructure of resin tags. The results showed that the push-out bond strength was 12.01±4.66 MPa in MetaSEAL group, significantly higher than that in the other three groups（P0.05）. Moreover, no statistically significant differences were noted in the push-out bond strength between RealSeal SE（5.43±3.68 MPa） and AH Plus（7.34±2.83 MPa） groups and between RealSeal SE and RealSeal（2.93±1.76 MPa） groups（P0.05）. Mixed failures were predominant in the fractured sealer-dentin interfaces in MetaSEAL and AH Plus groups, while adhesive failures were frequently seen in RealSeal SE and RealSeal groups. In conclusion, after complete removal of the smear layer, MetaSEAL showed superior bond ability to root dentin. The RealSeal SE is applicable in clinical practice, with its adhesive strength similar to that of AH Plus. The self-adhesive methacrylate resin-based sealer holds promise for use in endodontic treatment.
This study examined the adhesive strength of two self-adhesive methacrylate resin-based sealers（MetaSEAL and RealSeal SE） to root dentin and compared them with RealSeal and AH Plus in properties. A total of 48 extracted human single-rooted teeth were used to prepare the 0.9-mm thick longitudinal tooth slice（each per tooth）. Standardized simulated canal spaces of uniform dimensions were prepared in the middle of radicular dentin. After treated with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite（NaOCl） and 17% EDTA, tooth slices were allocated randomly to four groups（n=12） in terms of different sealers used： MetaSEAL, RealSeal SE, RealSeal, and AH plus groups. The simulated canal spaces were obturated with different sealers in each group. There were 10 slabs with 20 simulated canal spaces（n=20） used in each group for push-out testing. The failure modes and the ultrastructures of fractured sealer-dentin interfaces were examined. The remaining 2 slabs in each group underwent partial demineralization for observation of the ultrastructure of resin tags. The results showed that the push-out bond strength was 12.01±4.66 MPa in MetaSEAL group, significantly higher than that in the other three groups（P0.05）. Moreover, no statistically significant differences were noted in the push-out bond strength between RealSeal SE（5.43±3.68 MPa） and AH Plus（7.34±2.83 MPa） groups and between RealSeal SE and RealSeal（2.93±1.76 MPa） groups（P0.05）. Mixed failures were predominant in the fractured sealer-dentin interfaces in MetaSEAL and AH Plus groups, while adhesive failures were frequently seen in RealSeal SE and RealSeal groups. In conclusion, after complete removal of the smear layer, MetaSEAL showed superior bond ability to root dentin. The RealSeal SE is applicable in clinical practice, with its adhesive strength similar to that of AH Plus. The self-adhesive methacrylate resin-based sealer holds promise for use in endodontic treatment.
