期刊文献+

脊柱术后耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的治疗--附8例报告 被引量:7

Treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) infection after spine surgery: 8 cases report
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨脊柱术后耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染的合理治疗方法。方法:2007年7月~2012年12月共收治8例脊柱术后MRSA感染患者,女6例,男2例,年龄32—72岁,平均54.3岁。8例患者均行彻底清创冲洗、对口置管冲洗引流,根据引流液培养结果决定冲洗量及拔除冲洗管和引流管,同时联合抗生素辅助治疗,在静脉使用广谱抗生素前留取切口分泌物送检细菌培养和药敏试验,待细菌培养和药敏结果明确后调整抗生素,必要时还增加口服抗生素。结果:本组8例MRSA感染患者有1例死亡;另7例患者随访5~43个月,平均21个月,至末次随访时未见感染复发。其中4例经过对口置管冲洗引流后感染获得控制而保留了内置物.而另3例在内置物移除后感染才得到控制。患者总住院时间为26~200d,平均91.8d,有5例因手术部位感染于初次手术出院后再次住院,住院次数最多达5次。静脉抗生素的使用时间为14~144d.平均55.5d:其中有5例联合口服抗生素的时间为11-73d,平均31.4d。8例患者中有4例清创手术次数超过1次,最多达5次,其中1例因多次清创导致严重软组织缺损而采用旋转肌瓣覆盖后治愈。结论:脊柱术后MRSA感染治疗往往相对阑难,常需要增加住院时间、延长抗生素疗程、多次清创手术,甚至移除内置物才能有效控制感染。对于脊柱术后MRSA感染,决定是否移除内置物时主要考虑:①术后感染发生的时间〉30d时考虑移除内置物;②术后清创次数达到3次仍未能很好地控制感染时考虑移除内置物。 Objectives: To investigate the treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) in- fection after spine surgery. Methods: From July 2007 to December 2012, a total of 8 MRSA infected cases (6 females and 2 males) following spine surgery and with an average age at admission of 54.3 years (range, 32-72 years) was reviewed retrospectively, and their therapeutic results were observed retrospectively. All 8 cases underwent debridement, irrigation and drainage(I & D). The irrigation volume and time to remove the irrigating/drainage tube depended on the result of cultruing results of drainage. All cases took antibiotics as adjutant therapy, wound secretion was collected for bacterial culturing and drug sensitive test before the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, and antibiotics would be adjusted according to the result of drug sensitivity test. In some cases, oral antibiotics were used together. Results: One MRSA infection case was dead and 7 cases had wound healed, the 7 cases were followed up for 5-43 months(average, 21 months), no recurrence of infection was found at last follow-up. Among the 7 cases, 4 cases had the implants maintained, while re- moved in the other 3 cases. The average duration of hospitalization was 91.8 days (range, 26-200 days), 5 cases readmitted after the primary operation, maximized to 5 times. The average duration of intravenous antibi- otics treatment was 55.5 days (range, 14-144 days), 5 cases took oral antibiotics together, which lasted for 31.4 days(range, 11-73 days). Four of those 8 cases required multiple debridement with the maximum of 5 times, one ease eventually turned to undergo museuloeutaneous flap transplantation to cover the complex wound. Conclusions: Due to MRSA's resistance to many antibiotics after postoperative spinal infection, prolonged hospitalization and use of amount of antibiotics, multiple debribements, even removement of implants, can be considered. Implants removal should be taken into consideration when: (1)MRSA infection over more than 30 days after primary operation; (2)MRSA infection is still uncontrolled even after more than 3 times of debridement.
出处 《中国脊柱脊髓杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期164-167,共4页 Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord
关键词 脊柱手术 手术部位感染 耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌 冲洗引流法 内置物 Spine surgery Surgical site infection Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Irrigation anddrainage Implants
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献8

  • 1张光铂,刘成刚,郭万首,李淑荣.预防脊柱手术感染的几点体会与建议[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,1995,5(2):56-58. 被引量:7
  • 2Thalgot JS, Cotler HB, Sasso RC,et al. Postoperaive infections in spinal implants, classification and analysis. A multi center study. Spine, 1991,16:981-984.
  • 3Chang CC, Merritt K. Infection at the site of implanted materials with and without preadhered bacteria. J Orthop Res,1994,12:526-531.
  • 4Wimmer C, Gluch H. Management of postoperative wound infection in posterior spinal fusion with instrumentation. J Spinal Disord, 1996,9:505-508.
  • 5Viola RW, King HA, Adler SM, et al. Delayed infection after elective spinal instrumentation and fusion; A retrospective analysis of eight cases. Spine, 1997,22:2444-2451.
  • 6Aydinli U, Karaemiogullari O, Tiskaya K. Postoperative deep wound infection in instrumented spinal surgery. Acta Orthop Belg,1999,65:182-187.
  • 7仉建国,李书纲,杨新宇,田野,邱贵兴.脊柱侧凸后路矫形融合术术后感染的治疗[J].中华骨科杂志,2001,21(8):453-456. 被引量:53
  • 8吕国华,王冰,马泽民,康意军,李启贤.脊柱后路内固定术后迟发性感染的治疗[J].中国现代医学杂志,2002,12(15):22-24. 被引量:5

共引文献622

同被引文献53

  • 1田耘,陈仲强,周方,刘忠军.脊柱术后伤口深部感染的处理[J].中华外科杂志,2005,43(4):229-231. 被引量:71
  • 2史建刚,贾连顺,袁文,叶晓建,陈德玉,倪斌,田纪伟,沈康平.腰骶神经损害致马尾神经综合征的临床分期及早期诊断[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(7):491-493. 被引量:17
  • 3刘玉军,李学民,朱瑜琪.闭式抗生素灌洗治疗腰椎间盘术后椎间隙感染的效果[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2007,15(7):554-556. 被引量:14
  • 4Kim Jl, Suh KT, Kim SJ, et al. Implant removal for the management of infection after instrumented spinal fusion[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2010, 23(4): 258-265.
  • 5Rohde V, Meyer B, Schaller C, et al. Spondylodiscitis after lumbar diseectomy:Incidenee and a pwpe~l for prophylaxis[J]. Spine, 1998, 23(5): 615-620.
  • 6Sampedro MF, Huddleston PM, Piper KE, et al. A biofilm approach to detect bacteria on removed spinal implants [J]. Spine, 2010, 35(12): 1218-1224.
  • 7Mok JM, Guillaume TJ, Talu U, et al. Clinical out come of deep wound infection after instrumented posterior spinal fusion:a matched cohort analysis[J]. Spine, 2009, 34(6): 578- 583.
  • 8Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Oda T, et al. Surgical complications of posteriorlumbar interbody fusion with total faeeteetomy in 251 patients[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2006, 4(4): 304-309.
  • 9Mirovsky Y, Floman Y, Smorgiek Y, et al. Management of deep woundinfection after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with ca~es [Jl. J SninalDisord Tech. 2007. 20(2~: 127-131.
  • 10Mehbod AA, Ogilvie JW, Pinto MR, et al. Postoperative deep wound infections in adualts after spinal fusion: management with vacuum-assisted wound closure[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2005, 18(1): 14-17.

引证文献7

二级引证文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部