期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

英语口语行为测试中评卷员效应的多侧面Rasch模型研究

下载PDF
导出
摘要 在语言行为测试中，考生分数易受评卷员效应的影响，控制评卷员效应对考生分数的效度与信度是十分重要的：本文用多侧NRasch模型分析了某省一次英语口语测试的主要的评卷员效应。研究结果表明，多层面Rasch模型可以很好的帮助研究评卷员效应，本研究中各个评卷员的严厉度是不同的。评卷员总体上表现出了集中趋势，总体上并耒表现出晕轮效应，但是四位评卷员出现了晕轮效应。同时，大部分评卷员在应用评分标准时，都表现了较好的内部一致性，但是也有两位评卷员的内部一致性超出了模型的预测范围。
作者 邓博文
机构地区 广东海洋大学寸金学院
出处 《时代经贸》 2014年第2期263-263,共1页 TIMES OF ECONOMY & TRADE
关键词 评卷员 严厉度 集中趋势 晕轮效应 内部一致性 多层面RASCH模型
分类号 G40-051 [文化科学—教育学原理]
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Bachman,L.F,Lynch,B.K,Mason.M. Investigating variability in tasks and rater judgements in a performance test of foreign language speaking[J].Language Testing,1995.238-257.
  • 2Congdon,P.J,McQueen,J,. The stability of rater severity in large-scale assessment programs[J].Journal of Educational Measurement,2000,(02):163-178.
  • 3Engelhard,G,Jr,. Examining rater errors in the assessment of written composition with a many-faceted Rasch model[J].Journal of Educational Measurement,1994.93-112.
  • 4Engelhard,G,Jr,Myford, C.M,. Monitoring faculty consultant performance in the Advanced Placement English Literature and Composition Program with a many-faceted Rasch model(college Board Research Report No.2003-1)[M].New York:college Entrance Examination Board,2003.
  • 5Linacre, J.M,. Many-faceted Rasch Measurement[M].Chicago:MESA Press,1989.
  • 6Myford, C.M,Dobria,L,. Facets Workshop[M].Chicago,2006.
  • 7Myfor d,C. M,Wolfe,E.W,. Understanding Rasch measurement:Detecting and measuring rater ef ects using many-facet Rasch measurement:Part II[J].Journal of Applied Measurement,2004,(02):189-227.
  • 8Weigle, S.C,. Assessing writing[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2002.
  • 9Yang,R,. A multi-facet Rasch analysis of rater effects on an oral English proifciency test.OEPP Technical Papers[M].West Lafayette:Purdue University,2010.
  • 10刘建达.评卷人效应的多层面Rasch模型研究[J].现代外语,2010,33(2):185-193. 被引量：36

二级参考文献34

  • 1Eckes, T. 2005. Examining rater effects in TestDaf writing and speaking performance assessments: A many-facet Rasch analysis [J]. Language Assessment Quarterly 2, 3: 197-221.
  • 2Eckes, T. 2008. Rater types in writing performance assessments: A classification approach to rater variability [J]. Language Testing 25: 155-185.
  • 3Elder, C., U. Knoch, G. Barkhuizen & J. yon Randow. 2005. Individual feedback to enhance rater training: Does it work? [J]. Language Assessment Quarterly 2: 175-196.
  • 4Engelhard, G., Jr. 1994. Examining rater errors in the assessment of written composition with a manyfaceted Rasch model [J]. Journal of Educational Measurement 31, 2: 93-112.
  • 5Gyagenda, I. S. & G. Jr. Engelhard. 1998. Applying the Rasch model to explore rater influences on the assessed quality of students' writing ability [P]. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.
  • 6Hedge, J. W. & M. J. Kavanagh. 1988. Improving the accuracy of performance evaluations: Comparison of three methods of performance appraiser training [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology 73 : 68-73.
  • 7Johnson, V. E. & J. H. Albert. 1999. Ordinal Data Modeling [M]. New York: Springer-Vedag.
  • 8Kondo-Brown, K. 2002. A facets analysis of rater bias in measuring Japanese second language writing performance [J]. Language Testing 19, 1: 3-31.
  • 9Kumar, D. D. 2005. Performance appraisal: The importance of rater training [J]. Journal of the Kuala Lumpur Royal Malaysia Police College 4: 1-17.
  • 10LeBel, T. J., S. P. Kilgus, A. M, Briesch & S. Chafouleas. Forthcoming. The impact of training on the accuracy of teacher-completed direct behavior ratings [J]. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions.

共引文献35

时代经贸
2014年 第2期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部