2欧洲专利局《审查指南》第三部分第四章第1137,Guidelines for Examination in the European Patent Office [S/OL], April 2009, [2012-02-20] http://www.epo.org/law-practice.html.
3日本《审查指南》第二部分第二章第2.2(2)节,Examination Guidelines for Patent and Utility Model in Japan[S/OL],December 2011, [2012-02-20]. http://veww.jpo.go.jp/tetuzuki_e/t_tokkyo_e/1312-002_e.htmb.
4美国《审查指南》.Mamlal of Patent Examining Procedure(MPEP) {S/OL], Eighth Edition, Rev. 7, July 2008, 2141.03.December 2011, [2012-02-20]. http://veww.jpo.go.jp/tetuzuki_e/t_tokkyo_e/1312-002_e.htmb.
5欧洲专利局上诉委员会《判例法》第一部分第四章第7.1.3节.Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office[S/OL], Fifth Edition, December 2006, [2012-2-18]. http://www.epo.org/law-practice.html.
6韩国《审查指南》“专利实质条件部分”第三章第32节.Requirements for Patentability[S/OL], [2012-2-18]. http://www.kipo.go.kr/kpo/user.tdf?a=user.english.html.HtmlApp&c=92006&catmenu=ek03_06_01.
7Rebecca S.Eisenberg.Obvious to whom?Evaluating inventions fromthe perspective of Phosita. Berkeley Tech.L.J . 2004
8Jonathan J.Darrow.The Neglected Dimension Of Patent Law’’sPhosita Standard. Harvard Journal of Law&Technology . 2009
9Amy L.Landers.Ordinary Creativity in Patent Law:The ArtistWithin the Scientist. Missouri Law Review . 2010
10Toshiko Takenaka.Extent of Patent Protection in the United States,Germany,the United Kingdom and Japan:examination throughthe concept of’’person having ordinary skill in the art of theinvention’’. Patent Law and Theory:a Handbook of ContemporaryResearch . 2008
