期刊文献+

双寡头电力市场垂直合作减排的随机微分对策模型 被引量:6

Stochastic Differential Game Models of Vertical Cooperative Mitigation in Duopoly Electricity Market
原文传递
导出
摘要 考虑单电网公司与双发电商所组成的渠道结构,构建了发电商投资减排、电网公司投资消纳的优势互补的异质型垂直合作减排的随机微分对策模型,先后考察并比较了分散决策和集成决策下的反馈均衡结果。在此基础上,讨论了利润共享契约下系统增量利润的分配问题。研究表明:对于分散决策,电网公司选择性承担发电商的减排费用;两种决策下的发电商减排和电网公司购电价格以及分散决策下的减排补贴与发电商之间的减排竞争强度相关;在一定条件和范围内,合作博弈有利于提高电网公司购电电价,同时为此所带来的风险增大。 Considering the channel structure of a grid corporation and two power suppliers, stochastic dif- ferential game models of vertical cooperative mitigation are developed. The cooperation is heterogeneous and advantage--advantage, in which the power suppliers invest mitigation and the grid corporation invests utilization,and the feedback equilibria in the decentralized and integrated decision are investigated succes- sively. Based on the comparison between the Stackelberg game and cooperative game,the share of the sys- tem's incremental profit under a profit--sharing contract is discussed. The results indicate that the grid corporation would selectively undertake a potion of power suppliers~ mitigation expenses in decentralized decision. The equilibrium mitigation of power suppliers, purchase price and mitigation allowance of grid corporation are correlated to the mitigation competition coefficient. The cooperative game helps to raise purchase price in a certain condition and range,and brings about greater risk for the attempt.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第2期101-111,共11页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金资助项目(70903080) 国家电网公司管理咨询项目(SGTG-BRKT[2011]001) 中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(CDJXS12020002)
关键词 电力市场 低碳能源消纳机制 合作减排 减排竞争 随机微分对策 反馈均衡 electricity market low-- carbon energy utilization mechanism cooperative mitigation mitigationcompetition~ stochastic differential game feedback equilibrium
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

二级参考文献288

共引文献735

同被引文献62

  • 1周黎安.中国地方官员的晋升锦标赛模式研究[J].经济研究,2007,42(7):36-50. 被引量:5681
  • 2Raj Kumar Aggarwal.人工智能及其在含可再生能源电源的电网安全中的应用(英文)[J].电网技术,2007,31(20):46-54. 被引量:6
  • 3Elzen D M, Lucas P, Vuuren D. Abatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimes[J]. Energy Policy, 2005,33 (16) :2138-2151.
  • 4Boehringer C, Koschel H, Moslener U. Efficiency losses from overlapping regulation of EU carbon emissions[J]. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2008, 33 (3): 299 - 317.
  • 5Subrarnanian R, Gupta S, Talbot B. Compliance strate- gies under permits for emissions [J]. Production and Op- erations Management, 2007,16 ( 6 ) : 763 - 779.
  • 6Van Steenberghe V. Core stable and equitable allocations of greenhouse gas emission permits [R]. Discussion Pa- per, Belgian Federal Ministry for Environment, 2004.
  • 7Zheng Wei,Chen Rongda. The setting of initial allocation approaches of carbon emission per-mits[C]. Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Business Intelli- gence and Financial Engineering (BIFE), Wuhan,China, October 17- 20,2011.
  • 8Groenenberg H, Blok K. Benchmark based emission all oeation in a cap-and-trade system[J]. Climate Policy, 2002,2 ( 1 ) : 105 - 109.
  • 9Kling C L, Zhao Jinhua. On the long-run efficiency of auctioned vs. free permits [J ] . Economics Let-ters, 2000,69(2) : 235 - 238.
  • 10Ramudhin A,Chaabane A, Kharoune M,et al. Carbon market sensitive green supply chain network design [C]. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Manage- ment, Singapore, December 8- 11,2008.

引证文献6

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部