复杂产品系统创新的动态能力构建——基于探索性案例研究被引量：11

Development of Dynamic Capabilities of Complex Products and Systems——Based on Exploratory Case Study

下载PDF

导出

摘要动态能力是系统集成开发商实现复杂产品系统创新的关键能力.为构建复杂产品系统创新的动态能力维度,运用探索性案例研究方法,对中国北车集团大连机车车辆有限公司的产品创新进行了探索性案例研究.研究发现:复杂产品系统创新的动态能力由三个维度以及六个子维度组成,具体包括:客户导向的感知能力(政策搜索和高管社会资本)、多组织协同的控制能力(集成创新管理和自我组织网络)、交互学习能力(技术获取和知识吸收). Dynamic capabilities is the key capability for system integration developer of complex products and systems （COPS）. It aims to build dimensions of dynamic capabilities for the innovation of complex products and systems. It made an exploratory case study on product innovation of Dalian Locomotive and Rolling Stock Co. , Ltd. , CNR Group, and the longitudinal single case study reveals that dynamic capabilities of complex products and systems consist of three dimensions and six sub-dimensions, including customer-oriented perception （ policy search and senior executive＇s social capital）, control capability of multiple organizations coordination （ integrated innovation management and self-organi- zing networks）, interactive learning capacity （technology acquisition and knowledge absorption）.

作者苏敬勤刘静

机构地区大连理工大学管理与经济学部东北财经大学旅游与酒店管理学院

出处《研究与发展管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期128-135,共8页 R&D Management

基金国家自然科学基金重点项目"PORC框架下的国家自主创新体系国际化理论与政策研究"(71033002)

关键词复杂产品系统动态能力探索性案例研究 complex products and systems dynamic capability exploratory case study

分类号 F273.2 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献30

1Gann D M,Salter A J. Innovation in project-based,service-enhanced firms:The construction of complex products and systems[J].{H}Research Policy,2000,(7/8):955-972.
2Davies A. Competitive complex product systems:The case of mobile communications[A].1997.26-31.
3Davies A. The life cycle of a complex product system[J].International Journal of Innovation Management,1997,(03):229-256.
4Drnevich P L,Kriauciunas A P. Clarifying the conditions and limits of the contributions of ordinary and dynamic capabilities to relative firm performance[J].{H}Strategic Management Journal,2011,(02):254-279.
5Hobday M. Product complexity,innovation and industrial organization[J].{H}Research Policy,1998,(06):689-710.
6Hobday M. The project-based organization:An ideal form for managing complex products and systems[J].{H}Research Policy,2000,(7/8):871-893.
7Hobday M,Rush H. Technology management in complex product systems (CoPS):Ten questions answered[J].{H}INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT,1999,(06):618-638.
8Davies A,Hobday M. The business of projects:Managing innovation in complex products and systems[M].New York:Cambridge Press,2005.
9Davies A,Brady T. Policies for a complex product system[J].{H}FUTURES,1998,(04):293-304.
10Brady T. Tools,management of innovation and complex product systems[R].Brighton,U K:Working Paper prepared for CENTRIM/SPRU/OU Project on Complex Product Systems,EPSRC Technology Management Initiative,GR/K/31756,1995.

二级参考文献56

1吉国秀,王伟光.产业集群与区域竞争合作机制:一种基于社会网络的分析[J].中国科技论坛,2006(3):95-99. 被引量：11
2谭莉莉.网络治理模式探析[J].甘肃农业,2006(6):209-210. 被引量：11
3赵艳萍,王友发,邓小健,刘凤英.合作能力与中小企业绩效相关性的实证分析[J].江苏大学学报（社会科学版）,2006,8(5):83-86. 被引量：2
4KG Provan, HB Milward. Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public -- Sector Organizational Networks[J]. Public Administration Review, 2001:414-423.
5Weech - Melonado R, Benson KJ, Gamm LD. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Community Health Partnerships: A Stakeholder Accountability Approach [ J ]. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration,2003,26 : 58 - 92.
6M Mcguire. Collaborative Public Management : Assessing What We Know and How We Know It[ J]. Public Administration Review, 2006, (12) : 33 -43.
7O' Toole, Laurence J. Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research - Based Agendas in Publie Administration [J]. Public Administration Review, 1997,57( 1 ) : 45 -52.
8Mandell MP, Keast Robin. Evaluating Network Arrangements[J].Public Performance and Management Review,2007, 30(4) :574 -597.
9JM Geringer, L Hebert. Measuring Performance of International Joint Ventures [ J ]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1991, 22(2) : 249 -263.
10Zammuto RF. A Comparison of Multiple Constituency Models of Organizational Effectiveness [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 1984,9 : 606 - 616.