期刊文献+

引入错误严重性分级的软件可靠性模型 被引量:1

Software Reliability Models Incorporating Software Error Severity Level
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在对G-O模型的基本假设进行改进的基础上,将软件错误严重性分级引入G-O模型,建立了引入错误严重性分级的软件可靠性模型G-NHPP.按严重程度将软件错误严重性分为致命错误、严重错误和一般错误三类,从基本假设、模型度量、参数估计、数据要求等四个方面对软件可靠性模型G-NHPP进行了分析,使用序列似然比PLR图、U-结构图、Y-结构图的图形法和误差平方和、均方误差值、Akaike信息准则、预测风险率4种参数的数值法对软件可靠性模型G-NHPP进行了分析验证.验证结果表明,所建立的G-NHPP模型比G-O模型和J-M模型更接近实际,该模型具有良好的拟合效果和评估能力. On the basis of improving the assumption of G-O model, software error severity level is incorporated into G-O model, and a software reliability model---G-NHPP model which is incorporated into error severity is built. According to failure severity, the fail- ure can be divided into three levels which include the fatal failure, the serious failure and the general failure. G-NHPP model is ana- lyzed from four perspectives-basic assumption, model metrics, parameter estimation and data requirement, and is evaluated using both graphical notation of Prequential Likelihood Ratio ( PLR ), U-Plot and Y-Plot and four parameters' numerical method of sum of squared errors(SSE) , mean squared errors(MSE) , Akaike's information criterion(AIC) and predictive ratio risk(PRR). The vali- dation of analytical results shows that G-NHPP model comes nearer the truth than G-O model and J-M model, and the fitting results and the evaluation capacity are satisfied.
出处 《小型微型计算机系统》 CSCD 北大核心 2014年第3期566-570,共5页 Journal of Chinese Computer Systems
基金 技术基础项目(7210061)资助 电子工程学院科研基金项目(KY09056)资助
关键词 软件可靠性模型 非齐次泊松过程 模型度量 参数估计 software reliability models non-homogeneous Poisson process ( NHPP } model metrics parameter estimation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献28

  • 1李春芝,岳晓光,刘宏伟.考虑测试覆盖率和故障排除效率的软件可靠性增长模型[J].电子质量,2005(3):34-36. 被引量:3
  • 2刘宏伟,杨孝宗,岳晓光,曲峰.一个NHPP类软件可靠性增长模型框架[J].计算机工程与科学,2005,27(4):1-2. 被引量:4
  • 3赵靖,刘宏伟,崔刚,杨孝宗.考虑测试环境和实际运行环境的软件可靠性增长模型[J].计算机研究与发展,2006,43(5):881-887. 被引量:12
  • 4M.R.Lyu.Handbook of Software Reliability Engineering.New York:McGraw-Hill and IEEE Computer Society Press,1996
  • 5Xiaolin Teng,H.Pham.A software cost model for quantifying the gain with considering of random field environments.IEEE Trans.Computers,2004,53(3):380~384
  • 6J.D.Musa.Sensitivity of field failure intensity to operational profile errors.In:Proc.5th Int'l Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering.Piscataway,NJ:IEEE Press,1994.334~ 337
  • 7J.D.Musa.Adjusting measured field failure intensity for operational profile variation.In:Proc.5th Int'l Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering.Piscataway,NJ:IEEE Press,1994.330~333
  • 8Sy-Yen Kuo,Chin-Yu Huang,Michael R.Lyu.Framework for modeling software reliability,using various testing-efforts and fault-detection rates.IEEE Trans.Reliability,2001,50(3):310~ 320
  • 9Chin-Yu Huang,Sy-Yen Kuo,Michael R.Lyu,et al.Quantitative software reliability modeling from testing to operation.In:Proc.11th Int'l Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering (ISSRE' 00).Piscataway,NJ:IEEE Press,2000
  • 10Hiroyuki Okamura,Tadashi Dohi,Shunji Osaki.A reliability assessment method for software products in operation phaseproposal of an accelerated life testing model.Electronics and Communications in Japan,Part 3,2001,84(8):294~301

共引文献57

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部