期刊文献+

民法上的利益位阶及其考量 被引量:160

The Hierarchy of Competing Interests in livil Law
原文传递
导出
摘要 利益位阶是解决民事权益冲突的途径。确立利益位阶的规则,可以包括权利优于利益、公共利益优于个体财产利益、人格利益优于财产利益、生命健康权优于一般人格权等规则。在确定具体利益位阶时,如果法有规定,司法者应尊重立法者做出的价值选择。如果法无规定或存在漏洞,则需要裁判者以利益平衡为目的,综合考量系争利益与个人生命健康、个人尊严、社会其他成员,以及社会经济秩序等之间的关系,根据"实践调和"原则行使自由裁量权,对冲突利益的位阶进行排序,为解决利益冲突奠定基础。 To rank competing interests in civil laws serves to resolve conflicts of private interests.In this paper,the author argues for a number of hierarchies.Namely,private rights,private interests that are enumerated by private laws,so to speak,should be prior to private interests;public interests prior to private interests,interests of personality prior to interests of property;interests of life and health prior to other interests of personality.The judiciary should be loyal to the value judgments made by the legislature whenever they exist.In cases of legislative loopholes,the judiciary ought to balance all competing interests and other relevant elements,e.g.,life and health,human dignity,social economic order.When the judiciary ranks competing private interests by itself,it should follow the principle of proportionality.That is to say,the hierarchy serves to realize the interest claims to their best.
作者 王利明
出处 《法学家》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期79-90,176-177,共12页 The Jurist
基金 笔者主持的国家社科基金重大项目"法学方法论与中国民商法研究"(项目编号:13&ZD150)的阶段性成果
关键词 利益冲突 利益位阶价值选择 利益平衡 实践调和 Competing Interests Hierarchy of Competing Interests Value Judgments Interests Balance Principle of Proportionality
  • 相关文献

参考文献43

  • 1Harald Schneider, Die Giiterabwigung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts bei Grundrechtskonflikten: Empirische Studie zu Methode und Kritik Eis Konfliktlisungsmodelles, Nomos-Verl.-Ges in Baden-Baden, 1979.
  • 2Basil Markesinis, Foreign Law attd Comparative Methodology: A Subject and A Thesis, Oxford: Hart Publishing House, 1997.
  • 3[英]边沁 时殷弘译.《道德与立法原理导论》[M].商务印书馆,2000年版.第58页.
  • 4Alexy, A Theory f Constitutional Rights, Translated by Julian Rivers, London: Oxford University Press, 2002.
  • 5[德]卡尔·拉伦茂:《德国民法通论》(上册),王晓晔等译,法律出版社2003年版.
  • 6Portalis, Discours Prelim#mire Au ler Projet de Code Civil, Paris : Edition Confluences, 2012, p. 27.
  • 7苏力.《秋菊打官司》案、邱氏鼠药案和言论自由[J].法学研究,1996,18(3):65-79. 被引量:229
  • 8张平华.人格权的利益结构与人格权法定[J].中国法学,2013(2):43-57. 被引量:46
  • 9庞德.《法理学》(第3卷)[M].,.第16页.
  • 10Basil Markesinis, Foreign Law and Comparative Methodology: A Subject and A Thesis, Oxford: Hart Publishing House, 1997, p. 235.

二级参考文献265

共引文献1544

同被引文献2417

二级引证文献1809

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部