期刊文献+

微阵列比较基因组杂交胚胎植入前遗传学筛查技术在复发性流产患者中的应用研究 被引量:5

Application of Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Preimplantation Genetic Screening in Recurrent Miscarriage
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨微阵列比较基因组杂交胚胎植入前遗传学筛查(aCGH—PGS)技术对复发性流产(RM)患者辅助生殖临床结局的影响。方法:54例RM患者分为aCGH-PGS组(n=25)与非PGS组(n=29)。aCGH-PGS组胚胎行aCGH筛查,选择染色体整倍性胚胎植入,其临床结局与非PGS组相比较。结果:aCGH—PGS组中染色体整倍性胚胎占26.93%(42/156);平均移植胚胎1.3±0.8个,低于非PGS组2.6±0.6个(P〈0.01);胚胎着床率(57.58%)与临床妊娠率(61.90%)高于非PGS组(27.03%,P〈0.01;46.43%,P〉0.05),早期流产率(7.69%)低于非PGS组(38.46%,P〈O.01)。结论:经aCGH—PGS,植入1-2个染色体整倍性胚胎,可使RM患者获得更高的胚胎着床率及较低的早期流产率,是RM患者临床治疗的有效途径。 Objective: To investigate the effects of array comparative genomic hybridization-preimplantation genetic screening (aCGH-PGS) on the clinical outcome of assisted reproduction for recurrent miscarriage (RM) patients. Methods: The RM patients were divided into aCGH-PGS group (n=25) and non-PGS group (n=29). In aCGH-PGS group, the euploid embryos identified by aCGH technology were transferred. The clinical outcomes in two groups were compared. Results: In aCGH-PGS group, the euploid embryos accounted for 26.93% (42/156), and the average number of embryos transferred was 1.3 ± 0.8, lower than that in non-PGS group (2.6 ± 0.6, P〈0.01). The embryo implantation rate (57.58%) and clinical pregnancy rate (61.90%) in aCGH-PGS group were higher than those in non-PGS group (27.03%, P〈0.01; 46.43%, P〉0.05, respectively). The early pregnancy loss rate was 7.69% in the former, lower than that in the latter (38.46%, P〈0.01). Conclusion: Identification of the euploid embryos by aCGH-PGS then transferred such embryos, can reduce the number of embryos transferred (ET), and decrease the risks of multiple pregnancy. Furthermore, it can result in the higher embryo implantation rate and the lower early pregnancy loss rate. Application of aCGH-PGS is a valid clinical approach to treatment in assisted reproduction for RM patients.
出处 《生殖与避孕》 CAS CSCD 2014年第2期121-125,共5页 Reproduction and Contraception
基金 第四军医大学唐都医院2014年新技术新业务项目
关键词 胚胎植入前遗传学筛查(PGS) 微阵列比较基因组杂交(aCGH) 复发性流产(RM) 染色体非整倍性 preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) recurrent miscarriage (RM) aneuploidy
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献13

  • 1胡桂英.自然流产.见:乐杰主编.妇产科学[M].第6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.89.
  • 2Zinaman M J, Clegg ED, Brown CC, et al. Estimates of human fertility and pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril, 1996, 65(3):503-9.
  • 3Ohno M, Maeda T, Matsunobu A. A cytogenetic study of spontaneous abortions with direct analysis of chorionic villi. Obstet Gynecol, 1991, 77(3):394-8.
  • 4Strom CM, Ginsberg N, Applebaum M, et al. Analyses of 95 first-trimester spontaneous abortions by chorionic villus sampling and karyotype. J Assist Reprod Genet, 1992, 9(5): 458-61.
  • 5Lomax B, Tang S, Separovic E, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization in combination with flow cytometry improves results of cytogenetic analysis of spontaneous abortions. Am J Hum Genet, 2000, 66(5): 1516-21.
  • 6Bell KA, Van Deerlin PG, Haddad BR, et al. Cytogenetic diagnosis of "normal 46,XX" karyotypes in spontaneous abortions frequently may be misleading. Fertil Steril, 1999, 71(2):334-41.
  • 7Bryndorf T, Christensen B, Vad M, et al. Prenatal detection of chromosome aneuploidies in uncultured chorionic villus samples by FISH. Am J Hum Genet, 1996, 59(4):918-26.
  • 8Cai LS, Lim AS, Tan A. Rapid one-day fluorescence in sire hybridisation in prenatal diagnosis using uncultured amniocytes and chorionic villi. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 1999, 28(4):502-7.
  • 9Sparkes R, Johnson JA, Langlois S, et al. New molecular techniques for the prenatal detection of chromosomal aneuploidy.J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2008, 30(7):617-21, 22-7.
  • 10Thein A, Charles A, Davies T, et al. The role of comparative genomic hybridisation in prenatal diagnosis. B JOG, 2001, 108(6):642-8.

共引文献9

同被引文献60

  • 1Ljunger E,Stavreus-Evers A,Cnattingius S,et al.Ultrasonographic findings in spontaneous miscarriage:relation to euploidy and aneuploidy.Fertil Steril,2011,95(1):221-4.
  • 2Petracchi F,Colaci DS,Igarzabal L,et al.Cytogenetic analysis of first trimester pregnancy loss.Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2009,104(3):243-4.
  • 3Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine.Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss.Fertil Steril,2008,90(Suppl):S60.
  • 4Hodes-Wertz B,Grifo J,Ghadir S,et al.Idiopathic recurrent miscarriage is caused mostly by aneuploid embryos.Fertil Steril,2012,98(3):675-80.
  • 5Musters AM,Repping S,Korevaar JC,et al.Pregnancy outcome after preimplantation genetic screening or natural conception in couples with unexplained recurrent miscarriage a systematic review of the best available evidence.Fertil Steril,2011,95(6):2153-7.e3.
  • 6Sulliva N,Crosignani PG.Genetic aspects of female reproduction.Hum Reprod Update,2008,14(4):293-307.
  • 7Lathi RB,Westphal LM,Milki AA.Aneuploidy in the miscarriages of infertile women and the potential benefit of preimplanation genetic diagnosis.Fertil Steril,2008,89(2):353-7.
  • 8Barbash-Hazan S,Frumkin T,Malcov M,et al.Preimplantation aneuploid embryos undergo self-correction in correlation with their developmental potential.Fertil Steril,2009,92(3):890-6.
  • 9Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Freidine M, et al. Pregnancies following pre-conception diagnosis of common aneuploidies by fluo- rescent in-situ hybridization. Mol Hum Reprod, 1995, 1 (5): 265-9.
  • 10Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van Echten-Arends J, et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. New Engl J Med, 2007, 357(1):9-17.

引证文献5

二级引证文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部