摘要
目的探讨慢性乙型肝炎患者外周血T淋巴细胞表面共刺激分子的表达量变化及其意义。方法临床病例对照研究。收集2012年10月至2013年11月在苏州大学附属第一医院感染科住院的慢性乙型肝炎患者82例,其中男50例,女32例,年龄(42.25±14.22)岁,健康对照组30名来自本院预防保健科,其中男15例,女15例,年龄(42.32±3.74)岁;采用流式细胞术和定量PCR等技术测定慢性乙型肝炎患者外周血T淋巴细胞表面CD28、CTLA4、PD.1、Tim一3的表达、T淋巴细胞亚群(CD4+、CD8+、CD4+/CD8+),其中未经抗病毒及相关免疫治疗的有40例,经过抗病毒治疗有效的有30例,无效的12例,并结合HBV病毒载量、乙型肝炎e抗原和丙氨酸转氨酶等指标作综合分析。组间比较采用单因素方差分析和Kruskal—WallisH检验,两样本均数的比较采用t检验和Mann—WhitneyU检验,相关分析用Spearman+S检验。结果CD4+CD28+组间表达量健康对照组最高[404.65(331.65—536.09)],治疗无效组最低[277.15(249.90—344.25)],差异有统计学意义(H=29.81,P〈0.001);CD4+PD一1+组间表达量未治疗组最高[32.89(29.69~39.69)],治疗无效组最低[19.26(11.90—20.56)],差异有统计学意义(H=43.13,P〈0.001);CD8+PD.1+组间表达量未治疗组最高[15.47(12.50~17.78)],健康对照组最低[3.05(1.41~3.97)],差异有统计学意义(H=56.60,P〈0.001);CD4+Tim-3+组间表达量治疗无效组最高[199.62(55.61—239.45)]、健康对照组最低[70.62(53.88—112.32)],差异有统计学意义(H=41.03,P〈0.001);CD8+Tim-3+组间表达量未治疗组最高[82.50(78.69~84.58)],健康对照组最低[3.07(1.56—6.87)],差异有统计学意义(H=74.84,P〈0.001);与低病毒载量组相比,治疗前CD8+PD-1+在高病毒载量组中的表达量[17.87(13.38—20.94)]升高,差异有统计学意义(U=25.00,P〈0.001),治疗后CD8+PD-1+在高病毒载量组中的表达量[16.95(5.39~18.27)]升高,差异有统计学意义(U=63.50,P〈0.001);治疗后PD-1表达量与ALT也有明显的正相关性,其中CD4+PD-1+(r=0.689,P〈0.001)、CD8+PD-1+(r=0.751,P〈0.001)。结论在慢性乙型肝炎患者抗病毒治疗过程中,可能伴随有CD28、PD.1、CTLA-4和Tim-3的异常表达。共刺激分子的检测可为临床合理治疗慢性乙肝提供新线索。(中华检验医学杂志,2014,37:105-109)
Objective To investigate the significance of changes in expression of co-stimulatory molecules on T lymphocytes in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection. Methods In a casecontrol study, a total of 82 CHB cases including 50 male cases and 32 female cases (the mean age was 42. 32 ±3.74) were enrolled in the First Affiliated Hospital to Soochow University from October 2012 to November 2013, together with 30 cases health control age was 42. 32 ± 3.74). Patients were divided into (15 male cases and 15 female cases, and the mean three groups: 40 cases of non-treated, 30 cases of effective-treated and 12 cases of ineffective-treated with anti-viral drugs and immune-related therapy. The expression levels of CD28, CTLA-4, PD-1, Tim-3 on T cells subset from peripheral blood were determined by Flow Cytometry. Serum load of HBV DNA was detected by Real-time PCR and the serology markers such as HBeAg and ALT were detected by conventional methods The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analysis groups comparison. Independent samples t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to two sample comparison. Spearman's rank correlation test was used to analyze the correlation. Results The expression levels of CD28, CTLA-4 and PD-1 on CD4 in health control group was the highest compared to ineffective- treated group [404.65 (331.65 -536.09) vs 277. 15 (249.90-344.25) (H=29.81, P〈0.001); 32.89 (29.69-39.69) vs 19.26 (11.90 -20.56) (H=43.13, P 〈0.001), respeetivelyJ. The expression level of PD-1 on CD8 in pre-treated group was the highest ,while expression level in health control group was the lowest [ 15.47 ( 12.50 - 17. 78 ) vs 3.05 ( 1.41 - 3.97 ) ( H = 56. 60, P 〈 0. 001 ) ]. Similarly, the expression level of Tim-3 on CD4 in ineffective-treated group was the highest, while Tim expression on CD4 in health control group was the lowest [ 199.62 (55.61 - 239. 45 ) vs 70. 62 ( 53.88 - 112. 32) (H =-41.03, P 〈 0. 001 )1. The expression level of Tim-3 on CD8 in pre-treated group was the highest, while it was the lowest in health control group [ 82. 50 (78. 69 - 84. 58) vs 3.07 ( 1.56 - 6. 87 ) ( H =74. 84, P 〈0. 001)]. Compared to the group with low viral load, the expression level of PD-1 on CD8 both in the pre-treated group with high viral load and the post-treated group was significantly increased [17.87 (13.38-20.94) (U=25.00, P〈0.001); 16.95 (5.39-18.27) (U=63.50, P〈0.001), respectively]. Importantly, in the post-treated group, the PD-1 expression on CIM T (r = 0. 689, P 〈 0. 001 ) and on CD8 T ( r = 0. 751, P 〈 0. 001 ) was also positively correlated with ALT. Conclusions The abnormal expression of these co-stimulatory molecules may be present in the antiviral treatment process of CHB. It may provide new clues for the reasonable treatment of CHB. (Chin J Lab Med,2014,37:105-109)
出处
《中华检验医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2014年第2期105-109,共5页
Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine
基金
国家“十二五”科技重大专项子课题资助项目(2012ZXl0002-004-008)