摘要
对1998年~2007年省际面板数据的实证检验表明,在“螺旋式”的“双重”分权过程中,中央政府对地方政府的“纵向”分权对产业结构优化存在显著负效应,而政府对市场的“横向”分权对产业结构优化存在显著正效应。就地区差别而言,东部地区的“纵向”分权抑制了产业结构优化升级,而“横向”分权促进了产业结构优化升级;中部地区“横纵”分权均不利于产业结构优化升级;西部地区的“纵向”分权抑制了产业结构优化升级,而“横向”分权对产业结构优化作用效果不明显。
The paper, based on provincial panel data from 1998--2007, has an empirical test and finds that, in the process of the "spiral" and the "double" decentralization, the "vertical" decentralization, from the cen- tral government to the local government, has significant negative effects on the optimization of the industrial structure, while the "horizontal" decentralization, from the government to the market, has a significant pos- itive effect on industrial structure optimization. On the regional differences, the "vertical" decentralization of eastern area in China restrains the optimization and upgrade of industrial structure, while "horizontal" decen- tralization promotes the optimization and upgrade of industrial structure. The "vertical and horizontal" decen- tralization of central region is not beneficial to the optimization and upgrade of industrial structure; The "ver- tical" decentralization of western China restrains the optimization and upgrade of industrial structure, and its effect of "horizontal" decentralization on the optimization of the industrial structure is not obvious.
出处
《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第1期45-52,共8页
Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
关键词
财政分权
螺旋式分权
实证研究
产业结构优化
fiscal decentralization
spiral decentralization
empirical test
industrial structure optimization