新刑诉法中侦查讯问同步录音录像的程序规制:困境与出路

Procedural Regulations of Simultaneous Sound and Video Recording Applied in the Investigation and Interrogation in the New Criminal Litigation Law: Predicaments and Solutions

虽然我国新刑诉法已经明确确立了录音录像制度,但是依然存在选择性录音录像、录音录像证据移送不明确、控辨双方缺乏有效质证,以及不录音录像后果不明确等问题。基于对这些问题成因的分析,建议有关部门应当在借鉴域外有关立法和司法经验的基础之上,对录音录像证据的诉讼地位,录音录像的案件范围,质证问题以及违反录音录像规定的后果等问题予以进一步明确、完善,以确保该项法律制度能够得到良性运行。

Although the new criminal litigation law has stipulated the system of simultaneous sound and video recording,some problems still exist. For example,the sound and video recording is optional,and the delivery of sound and video records is not clear. After analyzing the causes,this paper suggests that we should,by drawing upon the legislation and judicature experiences in other countries,clarify and solve the following issues concerning sound and video recording so as to ensure the benign operation of this system: itslitigant status,its judicial scope,its testimony and the punishment for violating the stipulations.