期刊文献+

SON-R 6-40非言语智力测验在中国的适用性

Applicability of the SON-R 6-40 Non-verbal Intelligence Test in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 SON-R 6-40非言语智力测验是以非文字形式测量个体推理与空间能力的智力评估工具。研究旨在考查SON-R 6-40在中国的适用性。根据全国人口分布,在中国六大行政区6至40岁年龄人群中施测了1721人,通过与荷兰/德国混合样本比较,分析该测验的跨文化等值水平。结果表明:(1)测验信度与结构跨样本一致,说明该测验在两种文化下结构等值;(2)多样本验证性因素分析证明了该测验的测量单位等值性。因此,SON-R 6-40适合在中国推广使用以及用于智力的跨文化比较研究。 SON - R 6 -40 Non - verbal Intelligence Test( SON - R 6 -40) is a test for evaluating individual' s reasoning and spatial ability in nonverbal form. The aim of present study is to examine whether it can be applied directly in China. Based on the national census ,a sample of 1721 individuals of different ages from different provinces was selected. By comparing it with a mixed Dutch and German sample, the levels of equivalence for the SON - R 6 - 40 were analyzed. The results show that : ( 1 ) both the reliabilities and the construct of the test are identical between the two samples ,which means good construct equivalence in two cultures ; (2)by multiple - group confirmatory factor analysis, the metric equivalence of the SON - R 6 - 40 is clearly demonstrated. Therefore, the SON - R 6 - 40 test is adequate for application in China,and also can be used for cross -cultural studies on the intelligence.
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 2014年第1期36-42,共7页 Psychological Exploration
关键词 SON-R 6-40 非言语智力测验 跨文化等值 SON - R 6 - 40 nonverbal intelligence test cross - cultural equivalence
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1凌文辁;方俐洛.心理和行为测量[M]{H}北京:机械工业出版社,2003.
  • 2王旖旎.教育测评中的不公正问题──项目功能差异[J].中国远程教育,1999(8):39-41. 被引量:3
  • 3温忠麟,侯杰泰,马什赫伯特.结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则[J].心理学报,2004,36(2):186-194. 被引量:1300
  • 4徐建平,张厚粲,郭枝,杜艳婷,武琳,Peter Tellegen.斯-欧非言语智力测验在特殊群体中的应用[J].中国特殊教育,2011(11):21-25. 被引量:3
  • 5张厚粲,龚文,孙燕青,田效勋.斯—欧氏非言语智力测验的修订研究[J].心理科学,1997,20(2):97-103. 被引量:4
  • 6Cheung,G.W. Testing equivalence in the structure,means,and variances of higher-order constructs with structural equation modeling[J].{H}ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS,2008,(3):593-613.
  • 7Hakstian,A.R,Whalen,T.E. A K-sample significance test for independent alpha coefficients[J].{H}PSYCHOMETRIKA,1976,(2):219-231.
  • 8Hult,G.T.M,Ketchen Jr D.J,Griffith,D.A,Gonzalez-Padron,T Harmancioglu,N Huang,Y. Data equivalence in cross-cultural international business research:assessment and guidelines[J].{H}JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES,2008.1027-1044.
  • 9Jackson,D.L. Sample size and number of parameter estimates in maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis:a Monte Carlo investigation[J].Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal,2001,(2):205-223.
  • 10Kuwabara,M,Smith,L.B. Cross-cultural differences in analogical reasoning[A].2009.1-6.

二级参考文献38

  • 1张厚粲,龚文,孙燕青,田效勋.斯—欧氏非言语智力测验的修订研究[J].心理科学,1997,20(2):97-103. 被引量:4
  • 2张雨青,查子秀,龚正行,程念祖,刘彭芝.托尼非文字智力测验(TONT-2)的初步修订[J].心理科学,2003,26(2):330-331. 被引量:13
  • 3孟宪章,龚耀先.聋人智力量表的编制[J].中国临床心理学杂志,1995,3(2):75-78. 被引量:12
  • 4徐建平.基于认知加工的阅读增强方案:PREP评述[J].中国特殊教育,2006(1):83-90. 被引量:16
  • 5[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 6[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 7[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 8[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 9[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 10[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353

共引文献1305

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部