期刊文献+

义务教育阶段学业质量监测题库建设的理论与实践 被引量:2

Theory and Practice of Item Bank Construction for the Compulsory Education Academic Quality Monitoring
下载PDF
导出
摘要 义务教育阶段学业质量监测是学生学业质量评价的重要方式,在当前国内外教育质量评价领域中发挥着极为重要的作用。加强学业质量监测的题库建设,则是促进学业质量监测工具的命制与实施从经验型向科学化迈进的必由之路。本文在对义务教育阶段学业质量监测题库的性质和功能进行阐述的基础上,重点探讨了学业质量监测题库建设的理论基础、基本流程和关键环节,并进一步分析指出了当前题库建设中有待深入研究的问题。 Academic quality monitonng in the stage of compulsory education is an important way to evaluate students' academic quality, and it is of vital importance in the current domestic and foreign education quality assessment. Therefore, enhancing the construction of item bank of academic quality monitoring is a necessary way to promote the organization and implement of the test tools from experience to science. Based on the elaboration of the properties and functions of the academic quality monitoring in the stage of compulsory education, the research discusses the basic theory, process and key steps of the academic quality monitoring item bank, and points out the problems to be further studied in the study of the current item bank.
作者 田一 张咏梅
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 2014年第1期62-67,共6页 Psychological Exploration
关键词 义务教育阶段 学业质量监测 题库建设 compulsory education academic quality monitoring item bank construction
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献28

  • 1Yoko, K. (2004). Using genova and facets to set multiple standards on performance assessment for certification in medical translation from Japanese into English. Language Testing, 21 (1), 1-27.
  • 2Zieky, M. J. (2001). So much has changed: How the setting of outscores has evolved since the 1980s. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 249-281). Mahwah, N J: Erlbaum.
  • 3谢进昌.精熟标准设置方法的历史演进与诠释的新概念[J].国立国民教育研究学报,2006,16:157-193.
  • 4Bejar,I. (1983). Subject matter experts' assessment of item statistics. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 303-310.
  • 5Beretvas, S. N. (2004). Comparison of Bookmark difficulty locations under different item response models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28(1), 25-47.
  • 6Buckendahl, C .W, Smith, R .W, Impara, J. C., & Plake, B. S. (2002). A comparison of the Angoff and Bookmark standard setting methods. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39, 253-263.
  • 7Karantonis, A., & Sireci, S. G. (2006). The bookmark standard-setting method: A literature review. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25(1), 4-12.
  • 8Lee, G., & Lewis, D. M. (2001). A generalizability theory approach toward estimating standard errors of cutscores set using the bookmark standard setting procedure. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Seattle, WA.
  • 9Lee, G, & Lewis, D. M. (2008). A generalizability theory approach to Standard Error Estimates for Bookmark Standard Settings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 603-620.
  • 10Lewis, D. M., Mitzel, H. C., & Green, D. R. (1996). Standard Setting: A Bookmark Approach. In D.R.Green(Chair). IRT-based standard-setting procedures utilizing behavioral anchoring. Symposium conducted at the Council of Chief State School Officers National Conference on Large-scale Assessment, Phoenix, AZ.

共引文献15

同被引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部