期刊文献+

广州居民交通出行的分异趋势及对交通公平的启示 被引量:13

The Differentiation Of Transportation And Its Effects On Transportation Equality In Guangzhou
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着我国快速城市化和机动化,居民交通出行能力成为社会分化、影响公平的重要因素。通过对比广州1984年、1998年、2003年及2011年的交通出行特征发现,近三十年以来广州居民机动性大大增强,表现在生活性非通勤比例、出行频率、出行距离和机动交通比例均有较大幅增加,各出行结构指标已接近发达国家最低平均水平;居民使用地铁和小汽车等高费用出行方式的比例大幅增加,使用步行、自行车、电动车和轮渡等低费用出行方式的比例则大幅减少;不同性别、年龄和收入群体在出行结构上差异显著,这种总体机动性分化趋势和社会分异特征综合反映出弱势群体与强势群体之间存在着交通不公平性。交通政策应从追求"均一人群""均一结果"的整体效率目标,转向兼顾"不同群体""不同结果"的结构公平目标,逐步消除交通资源配置中的起点不公平和再分配不公平。 Residents’ transportation ability has become an important factor of social differentiation and inequality. By comparison of transportation characters in Guangzhou in 1984, 1998, 2003, and 2011, the author ifnds out Guangzhou residents’ mobility has improved distinctively. The frequencies, distance, automobile ratios in transportation al grow to a large extent and relevant indicators have got close to that of developed countries. Subway and car transport increase while pedestrian, bicycle, electric bicycle, and ferry transport decrease. The dif erence also exists among dif erent gender, age, and income groups. The character relfects transportation inequality between the upper and lower classes. In conclusion, the author suggests transportation policy change from uniform to dif erentiated visions to gradual y eliminate the inequality in transportation.
出处 《规划师》 北大核心 2014年第1期94-100,共7页 Planners
基金 教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(10YJC840036) 华南理工大学亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室开放基金项目(2011KB08) 广东省自然科学基金项目(S2012010010549)
关键词 交通出行 社会分异 交通公平 广州 Transportation Social dif erentiation Transportation equality Guangzhou
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Hall P. The Future of the Metropolis and its Form[J]. Regional Studies, 1997 (3) : 211-220.
  • 2Murray A, Davis R. EQuity in Regional Service Provision[J]. Journal of Regional Science, 2001(4): 577-600.
  • 3Currie G. Quantifying Spatial Gaps in Public Transport Supply Based on Social Needs[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2010(1): 31-41.
  • 4PATS(Pricing Acceptability in the Transport Systems). European Union Transport Research Fourth Framework Program[R]. Urban Transport, 2000.
  • 5Todd Litman. Evaluating Tran- sportation Equity: Guidance for Incorporating Distributional Im- pacts in Transportation Plan- ning[R]. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 2011.
  • 6Kain J. A pioneer's Perspective on the Spatial Mismatch Literature[J]. Urban Studies, 2004(1): 7-32.
  • 7Grengs J. Job Accessibility and the Modal Mismatch in Detroit[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2010(1): 42-54.
  • 8Sanchez T, O Shen, et al. Transit Mobi]ity, Jobs Access and Low- income Labour Participation in US Metro13olltan Areas[J]. Ur- ban Studies, 2004(7): 1313-1331.
  • 9PicKup L, G Giuliano. Transport and Social Exclusion in Europe and the USA[R]. Social Dimensions of Sustainable Transport: Tran- satlatlantic Perspect-ives. K. Donarghy, S. PopDelreuter and G. Rudinger. Burlington, VT, Ashgate, 2005: 38-49.
  • 10Pucher J, J Renne. Socioeconomics of Travel Behavior: Evidence from the 2001 NHTS(National Household Travel Survey)[J]. Transportation Quarterly, 2003(3): 49-77.

二级参考文献135

共引文献203

同被引文献114

引证文献13

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部