期刊文献+

不同扩大囊覆盖面积抗荷服的热负荷评价 被引量:1

Heat Load Evaluation of Various Extended Bladder Coverage Anti-G Suit
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究了 3种扩大囊覆盖面积抗荷服的热负荷。这 3种抗荷服的抗荷囊覆盖下体面积分别为43 % ,6 5 %和 90 % (以下用Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ组表示 )。 5名健康男性战士分别在 30 ,35 ,40℃环境中穿着 3组装备暴露 6 0或 90min。测量心率、皮肤温度、直肠温度、出汗量等。以综合热应激指数 (CIHS)评定热应激程度。受试者的心率、皮肤温度、直肠温度、出汗量均随着环境温度的升高而增加。各种生理指标的变化均以Ⅲ组为大。受试者配穿Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ组装备在 30℃环境中 90min时的CIHS分别为 3 31,3 0 8,3 6 1,均属轻度热应激 ;35℃条件下 90min时的CIHS分别为 4 86 ,4 49,5 15 ,均属中度热应激 ;40℃暴露第 6 0min时的CIHS分别为 5 77,5 47,6 0 8,均已接近重度热应激。以上结果提示 ,配穿扩大囊覆盖面积的抗荷服 ,必须通风散热 ,否则 ,限制热暴露时间。另外 。 The heat loads of three extended bladder coverage anti G suit(EBCAGS)were studied.The coverage of lower body of EBCAGS ranged 43%,65%,and 90% for groupⅠ,Ⅱ,and Ⅲ respectively.Five healthy male soldiers voluntarily wearing three EBCAGS were exposed to 30℃,35℃ and 40℃ for 60 or 90 min.Heart rate,rectal temperature,skin temperature and sweat quantity etc were determined.Heat stress was evaluated according to combined index of heat stress(CIHS).All physiological variations in group Ⅲ were the biggest.Each of above mentioned physiological indexes increased as the environmental temperature raised.The CIHSs of the subjects wearing group Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ at 30℃ for 90 min were 3 31,3 08 and 3 61 respectively, i e light heat stress.While at 35℃ for 90 min,the CIHSs were 4 86,4 49 and 5 15 respectively,belonging to moderate heat stress.The CIHSs at 40℃ for 60 min were 5 77,5 47 and 6 08 respectively,approaching to serious heat stress.Obviously,pilots wearing EBCAGS must be ventilated.In addition,the heat load of the body separated anti G suit was less than the body joined one.
出处 《工业卫生与职业病》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2001年第1期8-11,共4页 Industrial Health and Occupational Diseases
关键词 扩大囊覆盖面积抗荷服 热负荷 综合热应激指数 Extended bladder coverage anti-G suit Heat load Combined index of heat stress
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献3

共引文献14

同被引文献7

  • 1Balldin UI, O'Connor RR, Weachan PM, et al. Heat stress effects for USAF anti-G suits with and without a counter-pressure vest. Aviat Space Environ Med,2002,73(5):456-459.
  • 2Johnson CL, Nunneley SA, Russell Rl, et al. Thermal burden of an advanced anti-G ensemble. Safe J, 1994,24(1):15-18.
  • 3Nunneley SA. Thermal stress. In: DeHart RL, ed. Fundamentals of aerospace medicine. 2nd ed. Baltimore, Maryland,U. S. A: Williams & Wilkins, 1996. 399-422.
  • 4Candas V, Hoeft A. Clothing assessment and effects on thermophysiological responses of man working in humid heat. Ergonomics,1995,38(1) :115-127.
  • 5任兆生,欧阳骅,李伟,李俊勤,王琼.ВКК-15К一体化防护装备不通风时的热负荷评定[J].中华航空航天医学杂志,1998,9(3):154-156. 被引量:5
  • 6耿喜臣,詹长录,颜桂定,初旭,张五星,王荣娣,陆霞,吴铨.一种新型囊式抗荷服的抗荷及实用性能[J].中华航空航天医学杂志,1999,10(2):77-80. 被引量:20
  • 7耿喜臣,詹皓,颜桂定,初旭,张五星,辛益妹.咖啡因和三唑仑对人体基础+G_Z耐力的影响[J].中华航空航天医学杂志,2001,12(1):14-17. 被引量:4

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部