摘要
通过对《樊山政书》的研究可以知道,"律例"和"情理"是清代州县词讼纠纷审断中重要的裁断依据。由于"律例"与"情理"所考虑的侧重点差异,在词讼中可能会出现"律例"适用与"情理"权衡之间的冲突。当"律例"适用与"情理"权衡二者间发生冲突时,官员们倾向于不拘于"律例"规定而是注重词讼情形从"情理"的角度裁断词讼纠纷。不过,由于"情理"涵义的模糊性使得在词讼审判中官员在运用情理方面容易产生偏差。
On the basis of study on Fanshan Zhen Shu by Fan Zengxiang,it is found that that law and reason were the major trial rules in the process of civil trails of prefectures and counties in the Qing Dynasty. On account of emphasis difference,there appeared conflicts between law and reason in the process of civil trials. When the conflicts happened,the government officials were inclined to emphasize reason rather than law. However,because of the fuzzification of the meaning of reason,the official easily had deviation in its application.
出处
《石家庄学院学报》
2014年第2期50-55,118,共7页
Journal of Shijiazhuang University
基金
陕西省教育厅科研计划项目(11JK00217)