谭家健《〈谷梁传〉叙事比论》的几个问题

On Some Flaws of "'Guliang Zhuan' Narrative Theory" by Tian Jiajian

谭家健先生《〈谷梁传〉叙事比论》以记得事详便是优点,似乎记得事详就等于文学性强,这是偏见,文学性是由多种因素构成和影响的一个复杂的系统,绝不能仅仅以记得事详或写得字多为唯一判断标准。《春秋谷梁传》之宋楚泓之战、晋杀阳处父、楚屈完对齐桓公、柏举之战、殽之战之文学性明显优于《左传》之记载。

＂Guliang Zhuan Narrative Theory＂ by Tian Jiajian has the advantage of detailed narration. That seemingly detailed description was more a bias. Literature is made up of many factors and literature is a complicated system. More details or more written word could not be thought as the only criterion of literature. The literature of Chunqiu Guliangzhuan is obviously better than Zuo Zhuan in terms of the eeombat between Song and Chu at Hong Waters, the killing of Yang Chufu by Jin, Quwan from Chu answering King Qihuan, the combat of Baiju and the battle of Yao.