期刊文献+

组织间成本管理和供应商关系满意度的实证研究

An Empirical Study of Inter-organizational Cost Management and Supplier's Relationship Satisfaction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 企业为提高效益将更多的注意力关注于自己的核心竞争力,并将很多重要项目进行外包。同时为寻求成本控制即降低成本,以及技术的进步,企业需协同供应商开展组织间成本管理。对供应商来说披露成本信息会带来各种机会主义的风险。本研究通过202份问卷数据为基础,运用结构方程模型进行实证分析。研究结果表明,企业间开展组织间成本管理对供应商关系满意度的影响是正面的,供应商受益于组织间成本管理。组织间管理控制和信任这两种典型的商业交易中的治理机制对组织间成本调节而产生的关系结果的影响不一样,信任具有"独特的贡献力",而组织间管理控制的调节效应确不显著。 In order to improve efficiency, enterprise will pay more attention on their own core competitiveness, and outsource a lot of important projects. At the same time, in order to seek cost control and reduce cost, improve technology, enterprise are required to carry out inter-organizational cost management with supplier. For suppliers, disclosing cost information will bring the risk of a variety of opportunism. This study was based on data from 202 questionnaires, using structural equation model for empirical analysis. The results show that the impact of inter-enterprise organizational cost management is positive for supplier's relationship satisfaction, and suppliers benefit from the inter-organizational cost management. The results of management control and trust between the organization both governance mechanisms typical commercial transactions cost of inter-organizational coordination and the relationship not the same, the trust has a unique contribution to the force, inter-organizational management control is not significant.
作者 狄然 王念新
出处 《价值工程》 2014年第8期49-52,共4页 Value Engineering
关键词 组织间成本管理 供应商关系满意度 信任 组织间管理控制系统 inter-organizational cost management supplier's relationship satisfaction trust inter-organizational management control system
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Cooper R., Slagmulder R. Interorganizational cost management and relational context[J]. Accounting, Organization and Society,2004,29( 1 ): 1-26.
  • 2Cooper R., Yoshikawa, T. Inter -organizational cost management systems: the case of the Tokyo Yokohama Kamakura supplier chain [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 1994,37( 1 ):51-62.
  • 3Sako,M.,& Helper,S. Determinants of trust in supplier relations: evidence from the automotive industry in Japan and the United States [J]. Journal of Economies, Behavior & Organization, 1998,34:387-417.
  • 4Schoorman,F. D.,Mayer,R. C.,& Davis,J. H. An integrative model of organizational trust: Past ,present and future[J]. Academy of Management Review,2005,32:344-354.
  • 5Granovetter, M. The impact of social structure on economic outcomes[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives,2005,19( 1 ):33-50.
  • 6Anthony, R. Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis[D]. Harvard University, Boston,1965.
  • 7周子敬.结构方程模式(SEM)——精通LISREL[M].台北:全华出版社,2006.
  • 8Jap S.D., Ganesan S. Control mechanisms and the relationship life cycle: implications for safeguarding specifie investments and developing commitment [J]. Journal of Marketing Research,2000,37 ( 2 ):227-245.
  • 9温忠麟,吴艳.潜变量交互效应建模方法演变与简化[J].心理科学进展,2010,18(8):1306-1313. 被引量:88
  • 10Nooteboom, B. Trust: Forms, foundations, functions, failures and figures[J]. Chehenham: Edward Elgar,2002.

二级参考文献33

  • 1Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • 2Algina, J., & Moulder, B. C. (2001). A note on estimating the Joreskog-Yang model for latent variable interaction using LISREL 8.3. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 40-52.
  • 3Batista-Foguet, J. M., Coenders, G., & Saris, W. E. (2004). A parsimonious approach to interaction effects in structural equation models: an application to consumer behavior. Working Papers d'ESADE, 183, 1-28.
  • 4Coenders, G., Batista-Foguet, J. M., & Saris, W. E. (2008). Simple, efficient and distribution-free approach to interaction effects in complex structural equation models. Quality & Quantity, 42(3), 369-396.
  • 5Cohen, J., Cohen, R, West, S. G., & Aiken, L. A. (2003). Applied multiple regression~correlation analysis for the behavior sciences (3 ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • 6Fraser, C. (1980). COSAN User's Guide. Toronto, Ontario: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
  • 7Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essential and advances. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
  • 8Joreskog, K. G. (1998). Interaction and nonlinear modeling: issue and approaches. In R. E. Sehumacker & G. A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling (pp. 239-250). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaam.
  • 9Joreskog, K. G., & Yang, E (1996). Nonlinear structural equation models: The Kenny -Judd model with interaction effects. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advances in structural equation modeling techniques (pp. 57-88). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
  • 10Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1995). Measurement error in the analysis of interaction effects between continuous predictors using multiple regression: Multiple indicator and structural equation approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 348-357.

共引文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部