期刊文献+

不对称信息下的住宅质量管理 被引量:3

Housing Quality Regulation under Asymmetric Information
下载PDF
导出
摘要 住宅质量在买卖双方间存在严重的信息不对称,具有典型的信任品特征。分析住宅产品的信任品特征以及住宅市场上存在的处置不足、过度处置和过度取费三类质量欺诈,指出信息不对称问题是导致房地产开发企业缺乏保证或提高住宅质量激励的关键。国内对住宅质量管理的研究多从住宅建设过程切入,却一直未关注住宅质量的信任品特征对房地产开发企业质量保证的激励扭曲以及住宅质量管理制度选择的影响。结合住宅产品的信任品特征提出建立住宅质量信息披露制度是保证和提高住宅质量的重要途径。研究结论对完善我国住宅质量管理制度、减少住宅质量欺诈提供了重要参考。 Housing quality has a severe asymmetric information problem between consumers and sellers and exhibits typical feature of credence goods. This article analyzes the credence goods traits of housing and three kinds of quality frauds on housing market,which include overtreatment,undertreatment and overcharging. It points out that asymmetric information is the key that weakens incentives for real estate companies to ensure and enhance their product quality. Most researches on housing quality regulation in China have been developed from the point of housing construction process,yet oversees that the traits of credence goods of housing have seriously distorted the incentives for real estate companies to ensure housing quality and have an influential power over the selection of housing quality regulation policy. Based on the credence traits of housing,this article proposes that the housing quality information disclosure system is the key to ensure and to enhance housing quality. Policy suggestions in this article provide insights for housing quality regulation in China and help to lessen the quality fraud on housing market.
出处 《工程管理学报》 2014年第1期113-117,共5页 Journal of Engineering Management
关键词 住宅质量 信任品 质量信息披露 housing quality credence goods quality information disclosure system
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Darby, M. and E. Kami. Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1973, 16 (1): 67-88.
  • 2Olivier B, Christos C. Consumer uncertainty about which firm sells the high quality: on the slow penetration of some credence goods[C]. //Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Economics Association, Ottawa: Canadian Economics Association, 2003.
  • 3Brian E. Roe, lan Sheldon. Credence Good Labeling: The Efficiency and Distributional Implications of Several Policy Approaches[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2007, 89 (4): 1020-1033.
  • 4Uwe Dulleck, Rudolf Kerschbamer, Matthias SuRer. The economics of credence goods: on the role of liability, verifiability, reputation and competition. 1ZA Discussion Dissertation No. 4030, 2009.
  • 5Soham Baksi and Pinaki Bose, Credence Goods, Efficient Labelling Policies, and Regulatory Enforcement[J]. Environmental & Resource Economics, 2007 (37): 411-430.
  • 6崔晓青.住宅开发项目全面质量信息公开问题研究[J].工程质量,2006,24(1):48-51. 被引量:1
  • 7Emons, W. Credence Goods and Fraudulent Experts[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 1997 (28): 107-119.
  • 8Wolinsky, Asher. Competition in Markets for Credence Goods[J]. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 1995, 151 (1): 117-31.
  • 9王茜.中国建筑平均寿命仅为30年,年产数以亿计垃圾[EB/OL].http://news.ifeng.corn/mainland/201004/0405-17-1596306.shtml,2010-04-05/2013-03-15.

二级参考文献2

同被引文献8

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部