期刊文献+

有形信息、无形信息与分析师行为 被引量:4

Tangible Information, Intangible Information, and Analyst Behavior
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文研究了有形信息、无形信息对分析师行为的影响。实证结果表明,分析师主要基于有形信息进行预测,股评、股评变化、盈余预测以及盈余预测变化均主要受到有形信息的影响;而无形信息对股评和股评变化的影响最显著,一定程度上验证了“过度自信”假说。进一步的研究发现,分析师对有形信息过度重视,四种预测指标均表现出对有形信息的过度反应;而股评和股评变化对无形信息的过度反应最严重,这一点满足“过度自信”假说。 This paper studies how tangible information and intangible information affect analyst behavior. There are subjective judgment differences among recommendations, chan- ges of recommendations, earnings forecasts, and changes of earnings forecasts. Recommenda- tions and changes of recommendations mainly reflect corporate growth opportunities in the fu- ture, whereas earnings forecasts and changes of earnings forecasts mainly reflect corporate fi- nancial performances. Thus tangible information and intangible information should have dif- ferent impact on recommendations, changes of recommendations, earnings forecasts, and chan- ges of earnings forecasts. The empirical results show that tangible information and intangible information both significantly affect the four forecasting items, and they change in the same direction as tangible information and intangible information. Analysts' forecasts are mainly based on tangible information, because the four forecasting items are mainly affected by tangi- ble information. However, compared to earnings forecasts and changes of earnings forecasts, intangible information affect recommendations and changes of recommendations more signifi- cantly, which means the overconfidence hypothesis partially makes sense. Further, analysts overweight tangible information, because all of the four forecasting items overreact to tangible information. But in contrast, recommendations and changes of recommendations overreact to intangible information more strongly, which is in accordance with the overconfidence hypoth- esis. Finally, it's worth noting that earnings forecasts and changes of earnings forecasts also overreact to intangible information, which indicates that analysts are incapable to fully under stand intangible information, this causes earnings forecasts and changes o{ earnings forecasts overreact to intangible information.
作者 黄霖 黄宇虹
出处 《中国会计评论》 CSSCI 2013年第3期301-316,共16页 China Accounting Review
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(JBK1207084)
关键词 有形信息 无形信息 过度反应 Tangible Information,Intangible Information, Overreaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Fama E F,French K R.Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies[].The Journal of Finance.1996
  • 2Paul Asquith,Michael B. Mikhail,Andrea S. Au.Information content of equity analyst reports[J].Journal of Financial Economics.2004(2)
  • 3Francis,Jennifer,and Leonard Soffer.The relative informativeness of analysts’stock recommendations and earningsforecast revisions[].Journal of Accountancy.1997
  • 4Carhart,Mark M.On persistence in mutual fund performance[].The Journal of Finance.1997
  • 5Harrison Hong,Jeremy C Stein.A unified theory of underreaction, momentum trading and overreaction in asset markets[].The Journal of Finance.1999
  • 6李丹,贾宁.盈余质量、制度环境与分析师预测[J].中国会计评论,2009,7(4):351-370. 被引量:77
  • 7胡奕明,林文雄,王玮璐.证券分析师的信息来源、关注域与分析工具[J].金融研究,2003(12):52-63. 被引量:97
  • 8Fama Eugene F,Kenneth R French.Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds[].The Journal of Finance.1993
  • 9胡奕明,林文雄.信息关注深度、分析能力与分析质量——对我国证券分析师的调查分析[J].金融研究,2005(2):46-58. 被引量:74
  • 10De Bondt WFM,Thaler RH.Does the Stock Market Overreact?[].Journal of Finance The.1985

共引文献435

同被引文献74

引证文献4

二级引证文献154

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部