期刊文献+

《史记》、《汉书》对董仲舒及其学说的评述 被引量:2

The Review of 《Historical Records》and 《The History of Han Dynasty》 to DONG Zhong- shu and his Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 董仲舒在《史记》与《汉书》中分别有传。不同的是,《史记》中是合传,司马迁对董仲舒并没有过多的正面评价,而班固则为董仲舒单独立传,并高度钦许。究其原因,除了家学渊源、历史观存在差异外,重要的是时代思潮变迁所致。汉朝对儒学的热衷促使儒学从"百家"到"独尊"地位的转变,影响了包括司马迁、班固在内的社会群体的心理转变,这也导致了他们对董仲舒及其学说的载记与评述存在差异。 In 《Historical Records》 and 《 The History of Han Dynasty》 there is the biography of DONG Zhong - shu respectively. The difference of the two is in the former the biography is a co - biography, where SIMA Qian didn' t give much positive evaluation, while BAN Gu gave him a separate biography and highly appraised him. The reason why lies in besides the difference of family learning and historic view, the important one is the change of time trend of thought. The love of the government of Han dynasty to Confucianism, made its position change from "hundred families" to "be singly respected"; also affected the psychological change of the social groups including SIMA Qian and BAN gu, which also influenced the differences of their reviews about DONG Zhong - shu and the records about his learning.
作者 张月 任树民
机构地区 北华大学文学院
出处 《黄河科技大学学报》 2014年第1期76-78,共3页 Journal of Huanghe S&T University
关键词 《史记》 《汉书》 董仲舒 合传与独传 原因 《Historical Records》 《History of Han Dynasty》 DONG Zhong - shu co - biography and single biography
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1班固.汉书[M]北京:中华书局,1962.
  • 2张溥;殷孟伦.汉魏六朝百三家集题辞注[M]北京:中华书局,2007.
  • 3司马迁.史记[M]北京:中华书局,1982.
  • 4严可均.全汉文[M]北京:商务印书馆,1999.
  • 5严可均.全后汉文[M]北京:商务印书馆,1999256.
  • 6黄朴民.天人合一--董仲舒与汉代儒学思想[M]长沙:岳麓书社,199937.

同被引文献65

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部