不同液体复苏抢救创伤非控制出血性休克的对比分析

Comparative Analysis on the First Aid of Different Fluid Resuscitation for Uncontrolled Hemorrhagic Shock after Trauma

目的:探究分析对创伤非控制出血性休克患者使用不同液体复苏抢救的临床效果。方法:选取本院2011年3月-2013年3月收治的50例创伤非控制出血性休克患者作为实验组,采取限制性液体复苏抢救措施;以本院2009-2011年收治的50例创伤非控制出血性休克患者的临床资料作为对照组,采取充分液体复苏抢救。比较两组患者治疗情况及并发症发生情况。结果:实验组患者平均输液量、PT和病死率均明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);实验组患者抢救后并发症发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:对创伤非控制出血性休克患者应用限制性液体复苏进行抢救有突出的临床效果,值得推广。

Objective： To analyze clinical effect of the first aid of different fluid resuscitation for uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock after trauma. Method： 50 cases of patients with uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock after trauma from March 2011 to March 2013 were collected as the experiment group, 50 cases of patients with the same condition from 2009 to 2011 were collected as the control group. The treatment and complications of the two groups were compared. Result： The average of transfusion, PT, and fatality in the experiment group were lower than those in the control group （ P〈0.05 ） ; the complication rates was lower than that in the control group （ P〈0.05 ） . Conclusion： It has clinical effect for patients by the first aid of different fluid resuscitation with uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock after trauma, and it is worthy of promotion.