摘要
目的:进一步研究和比较临床治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征实践过程中,采用鼻塞式持续气道正压给氧(鼻塞CPAP)治疗方法与传统头罩吸氧治疗方法的临床疗效差异,从而为相关临床实践研究提供依据。方法:选取2011年12月-2013年6月本院收治的40例新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征患儿的临床资料进行回顾性分析,观察比较两组患者实施不同临床治疗方法前后的血气分析情况以及临床治疗效果。结果:经过治疗后,治疗组的PaO2、PaCO2和SaO2等指标水平均明显优于对照组,且治疗组的总有效率明显高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在临床针对新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征患者实施治疗的实践过程中,采用鼻塞CPAP治疗方式的临床效果显著,是临床治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的可靠选择。
Objective:To further study and compare the differences of the clinical effect of Nasal CPAP and the traditional head hood treatment in the neonatal respiratory distress syndrome,so as to provide the basis for clinical practice and research.Method:40 cases with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome from December 2011 to June 2013 in our hospital were selected as the research objects,and they were retrospectively analyzed.Before and after the implementation of blood gas analysis in different clinical treatment method and clinical effect of the two groups were observed and compared.Result:The PaO2,PaCO2 and SaO2 and other indicators of the treatment group were significantly better than those of the control group,and the total effective rate in treatment group was significantly higher than that in the control group,the differences were statistically significant(P〈0.05).Conclusion:In clinical practice for neonatal respiratory distress syndrome,the clinical treatment effect of nasal continuous positive airway pressure of oxygen treatment is significant,and it is the reliable choice of the clinical treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.
出处
《中国医学创新》
CAS
2014年第5期57-58,共2页
Medical Innovation of China
关键词
鼻塞式持续气道正压给氧
新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征
临床效果
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure oxygen
Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome
Clinical effect