期刊文献+

经济转型时期的资本调整成本、技术冲击与扩张性货币政策效果 被引量:12

Capital Adjustment,Technology Shock and Expansionary Monetary Policy during Transition Period of China
原文传递
导出
摘要 实证分析中国经济中资本调整成本的来源、大小和影响,根据1993-2011年宏观经济数据校准引入中国现实经济特征的新凯恩斯模型,发现包含资本调整成本的模型能在相当程度上解释中国宏观经济动态。模拟结果显示,后危机时期资本调整成本增大会弱化技术进步对经济增长的促进作用,对扩张性货币政策效力则制约更显著,且产出和消费均经历约5个季度的倒驼峰调整过程,呈现典型的“高投资低消费”的有效需求不足局面。 Based on the empirically evidence of China's capital adjustment costs (CAC), this paper introduces CAC and other reality-economic characteristics into new keynesian model, which can explain the macroeconomic dynamic to a consider- able degree. The model simulation results show that: during the transition period characterized by increasing CAC, capital market frictions will weaken the effect of technology progress in promoting economic growth. Meanwhile, the constraints on the effectiveness of expansionary monetary policy are more significant, the output and consumption experience about five quarters~ inverted hump process to adjust, which makes economy in the situation of lack of effective demand characterized by the coexistence of high investment and low consumption.
出处 《数量经济技术经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期56-73,共18页 Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics
基金 国家社会基金科学项目"中国货币政策和金融稳定性研究"(10cjl015)的资助
关键词 调整成本 新凯恩斯 经济转型 Adjustment Costs New Keynesian Transition Period
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Baxter M., Crucini M., 1993, Explaining Saving: Investment Correlations [J]. American Eco- nomic Review, 83 (3), 416-436.
  • 2Beaudry P. , Pottier F. , 2007, When Can Changes in Expectations Cause Business Cycle Fluctuation in Neoclassical Settings? [J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 135, 458-477.
  • 3Boldrin M. , Christiano L. , Fisher J. , 2001, Habit Persistence, Asset Returns, and the Business Cycle [J]. American Economic Review, 91 (1), 149-166.
  • 4Cooper R. , Haltiwanger J. , 2006, On the Nature of Capital Adjustment Costs [J]. Review of Eco- nomic Studies, 73, 611-633.
  • 5Dib A. , 2001, An Estimated Canadian DSGE Model with Nominal and Real Rigidities [R]. Bank of Canada, Working Paper, No. 2001-26.
  • 6Giuseppe Bertola, Ricardo J. Caballero, 1990, Kinked Adjustment Costs and Aggregate Dynamics [R]. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • 7Lawrence J. Christiano, Martin Eichenbaum, Charles L. Evans, 2005, NominalRigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy [J]. Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, 113 (1), 1-45.
  • 8Marimon R. , Scott A. , 1999, Computational Methods for the Study of Dynamic Economies I-M]. Oxford University Press.
  • 9Wurgler Jeffey, 2000, Financial Markets and the Allocation of Capital [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 58 (1-2), 187-214.
  • 10耿强,江飞涛,傅坦.政策性补贴、产能过剩与中国的经济波动——引入产能利用率RBC模型的实证检验[J].中国工业经济,2011(5):27-36. 被引量:246

二级参考文献298

共引文献2613

同被引文献182

引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部