期刊文献+

神农架林区河流生态系统健康评价 被引量:12

River ecosystem health assessment of the Shennongjia Forest Region
原文传递
导出
摘要 为监测神农架林区河流健康状况及人为活动对其水体理化特征和生物群落的影响,基于水质类别、大型底栖动物Shannon-Wiener多样性指数及BMWP记分系统(Biological Monitoring Working Party Score System)对神农架林区河流生态系统健康进行评价.结果显示,水质、大型底栖动物Shannon-Wiener多样性指数以及BMWP记分系统评价为健康的样点比例分别为36.67%、63.30%和50%.大型底栖动物Shannon-Wiener多样性指数和BMWP记分系统2种评价方法的结果存在极显著的相关性(P<0.01),具有较好的一致性.3种评价方法均显示亚健康或健康状态的样点比例达到了66.67%,表明神农架林区河流生态系统总体健康状况良好,但部分样点受到了一定程度的污染与干扰. An investigation was carried out in May 2011 and April 2012 in order to assess the effects of anthropogenic disturbance on physicochemical characteristics and organisms of rivers in the Shennongjia Forest Region. Based on water quality, Shannon-Wiener index of macroinvertebrates and Biological Monitoring Working Party (BMWP) Score System, ecosystem health of 30 river sites in the Shennongjia Forest Region were evaluated. Water quality of river sites in the Shennongjia Forest Region indicated that 36.67% of all sample sites were "healthy"; Shannon-Wiener index showed 63.30% of them "healthy"; while BMWP score indicated the percentage of "healthy" sites as 50%. There was a significant liner relationship between the evaluation of Shannon-Wiener index and BMWP score (P 〈 0.01), demonstrating that it was possible to use the two indices to monitor and assess the river ecosystem health in the Shennongjia Forest Region. According to the results of the three methods combined, 66.67% of all sample sites were the Shennongjia Forest Region is generally healthy. 'subhealthy" and "healthy", indicating the river ecosystem in
出处 《应用与环境生物学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期35-39,共5页 Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology
基金 国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2012ZX07501002-007) 神农架本底资源综合调查项目(2012SNJ002)资助~~
关键词 神农架 河流生态系统 健康评价 大型底栖动物 Shannon-Wiener多样性指数 BMWP记分 Shennongjia river ecosystem health assessment macroinvertebrate Shannon-Wiener index BiologicalMonitoring Working Party score
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Karr JR. Defining and measuring river health [J]. Freshwater Biol, 1999, 41: 221-234.
  • 2李凤清,蔡庆华,唐涛,黎道丰,杨顺益,徐耀阳.基于河流环境与生物复合指标评价辽北地区河流生态系统健康[J].应用与环境生物学报,2010,16(1):38-45. 被引量:27
  • 3Nagrodski A, Murchie KJ, Stamplecoskie KM, Suski CD, Cooke SJ. Effects of an experimental short-term cortisol challenge on the behaviour of wild creek chub Semotilus atromaculatus in mesocosm and stream environments [J]. J Fish Biol, 2013, 82 (4): 1138-1158.
  • 4Kerans BL, Karr JR. A benthic index of biotic integrity (B-IBI) for rivers of the Tennessee Valley [J]. Ecol Appl, 1994, 4 (4): 768-785.
  • 5Mustow SE. Biological monitoring of rivers in Thailand: use and adaptation of the BMWP score [J]. Hydrobiologia, 2002, 479 (1-3): 191-229.
  • 6周晓铁,韩宁宁,孙世群,王晓辉,何翔亮.安徽省河流和湖库型饮用水水源地水质评价[J].湖泊科学,2010,22(2):176-180. 被引量:32
  • 7张微微,孙丹峰,李红,周连第.北京密云水库流域1980~2003年地表水质评价[J].环境科学,2010,31(7):1483-1491. 被引量:26
  • 8Bozzetti M, Schulz UH. An index of biotic integrity based on fish assemblages for subtropical streams in southern Brazil [J]. Hydrobiologia, 2004, 529: 133-144.
  • 9Marchant R, Norris RH, Milligan A. Evaluation and application of methods for biological assessment of streams: summary of papers [J]. Hydrobiologia, 2006, 572: 1-7.
  • 10Thorne STJR, Williams WP. The response of benthic macroinvertebrates to pollution in developing countries: a multimetric system of bioassessment [J]. Freshwater Biol, 1997, 37 (3): 671-686.

二级参考文献171

共引文献2465

同被引文献154

引证文献12

二级引证文献89

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部