期刊文献+

经阴道彩色多普勒超声评分在育龄妇女附件肿物诊断中的应用 被引量:1

Application of diagnostic scores by transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography in the adnexal mass of fertile woman
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经阴道彩色多普勒超声评分在育龄妇女附件肿物诊断中的应用价值。方法前瞻性研究145例育龄妇女附件肿物的物理性质评分(PMCs)及血流信号评分(BFSs)结果,以PMCs≥3及BFSs≥5诊断附件肿物为恶性,以病理结果为对照,评价其诊断效果。结果 PMCs及BFSs在良恶性附件肿物中比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001),恶性肿物血流RI值较良性低(P<0.001)。ROC曲线显示诊断恶性肿物的最佳阈值为PMCs≥3和BFSs≥5,评分系统的阳性取值结果与ROC曲线的最佳诊断阈值结果是一致的。结论 PMCs≥3和BFSs≥5时对经阴道彩色多普勒超声诊断附件肿物恶性方面有帮助;PMCs和BFSs具有简便易行的实用价值。 Objective To evaluate the application value of the diagnostic scores for the adnexai mass oi terile woman by transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography. Methods A prospective study of 145 fertile women with adnexal mass was per- formed to calculate the physical morphological classification scores (PMCs) and the blood flow signals scores (BFSs), in which the scores were considered positive of malignancy for PMCs ≥3 and BFSs≥5. The diagnostic effect in comparison with patho- logical results was evaluated. Results There were statistical differences in malignant group and benign group (P〈0. 001) with both PMCs ≥3 and BFSs≥5 as a standard of diagnosis of malignancy, which was consistent with the optimal cut-off by the ROC curve. The blood RI of malignant masses was lower than that of benign masses (P〈0. 001). Conclusion The value of PMCs 3 and BFSs≥5 is useful for predicting malignancy of adnexal mass by transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography, the diagnostic scores have a simple and practical application value.
出处 《福建医药杂志》 CAS 2014年第1期99-101,共3页 Fujian Medical Journal
关键词 经阴道超声检查 彩色多普勒超声 附件肿物 评分 诊断 transvaginal ultrasonography color Doppler ultrasound adnexal mass score diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Valentin L, Sladkevicius P, Marsdl K. Limited contribution of Doppler velocimetry to the differential diagnosis of extrauterine pelvictumors [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 1994, 83 (3): 425-433.
  • 2Caruso A, Caforio L, Testa A C, et ak Transyaginal color Doppler ultrasonography in the presurgical characterization of adnexal masses [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 1996, 63 (2). 184-191,.
  • 3周永昌,郭万学.超声医学[M].第4版.北京:科学技术文献出版社,2003:86-88.
  • 4Marret H. Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of (variar cysts: indications, pertinence and diagnostic criter, [J]. Cy necol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), 2001, 310 ( l Sufp[),, $20-33.
  • 5中华医学会编著.临床技术操作规范超声医学分册[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2010:1-6.
  • 6徐纯香,张震宇,盛晓滨.恶性危险指数在附件包块术前诊断中的应用[J].中国误诊学杂志,2009,9(24):5800-5801. 被引量:1
  • 7Jacobs I, Oram D, Fairbanks J, et al. A risk of malgaarcy in- dex incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and meopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer [-J]. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 1990, 97 (10) : 922-929.
  • 8孙丽芳,董丽,刘燕儒,郑蓉.形态指数用于预测绝经后妇女附件包块恶性危险147例临床分析[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2009,10(2):113-115. 被引量:2
  • 9程智,杨通明,吴泽惠,唐石初,刘世平.二维及彩色多普勒超声鉴别卵巢肿瘤228例[J].肿瘤学杂志,2007,13(4):321-322. 被引量:4
  • 10Rumack C M, Wilson S R, Charboneau J W, e l. Diagnostic Ultrasound r M . 4th ed. Philadephia: Mosby, 2011: 584-586.

二级参考文献17

共引文献4

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部