期刊文献+

美国城市规划中的社区听证及我们的思考 被引量:7

Community Hearing in American Urban Planning and Our Thought
原文传递
导出
摘要 20世纪60-70年代,美国城市化进程加快。在老城区改造和新社区建设中,规划权被授予给了社区,社区作为自治组织,通过听证会的形式,让社区居民参与到社区基础设施建设、环境保护等环节,不仅有效维护了低收入人群的利益,也很好地平衡了社区建设中各利益群体的权利与义务,为打造舒适、安逸的社区人的社区做出了突出贡献。我国的城镇化进程需要借鉴美国城市规划中社区听证的经验,让政府、公众、开发企业及其他利害关系方在城市规划听证中沟通、了解、妥协,以有效避免因规划不合理导致的社会冲突与矛盾的频发。 In 1960s-70s, the American urbanization accelerated. In its old city transformation and new community building, the planning right was granted to the community. As an autonomous organization, the community, by way of hearings, made community residents participate into the community infrastructure construction, environmental protection and other parts, not only effectively safeguarding the interest of low-income people, but also well balancing the rights and obligations of all groups in community construction, which contributed much to the building of the comfortable and cozy community. For China’s urbanization, we also need to refer to the above experience, letting the government, the public, and the developers as well as other stakeholders communicate, understand and compromise in community planning hearings, to effectively avoid frequent social conlficts or contradictions caused by unreasonable planning.
作者 黄凤兰
出处 《行政法学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期133-139,共7页 ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
关键词 城市规划 社区规划 社区利益 社区规划听证 Urban Planning Community Planning Community Interest Community Planning Hearing
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献7

  • 1[1]Abraham Lincoln Great Speeches (with historical notes by John Grafton). New York: Dover Publications, Inc. 103~104.另可参考[9]中第17页
  • 2[2]Pual Davidoff. Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning. 1965. Richard T.LeGates & Frederic Stout(Ed.), The City Reader(second edition), Routledge Press, 2000. 423~424.也有学者将Advocacy Planning译为“倡导性规划”,参考[10]和[12]
  • 3[3]Nigel Taylor. Urban Planning Theory Since 1945. SAGE Publication.1998
  • 4[5]Sherry Arnstein. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. 1969. Richard T.LeGates & Frederic Stout(Ed.), The City Reader(second edition), Routledge Press, 2000. 240~241
  • 5[6]David Harvey. Social Justice, Postmodernism, and the City. 1992. Richard T.LeGates & Frederic Stout(Ed.), The City Reader(second edition), Routledge Press, 2000. 199~200
  • 6[7]Peter Hall. The City of Theory. 1996. Richard T.LeGates & Frederic Stout(Ed.), The City Reader(second edition), Routledge Press, 2000. 362
  • 7[8]Melville C.Branch. Comprehensive City Planning. Planners Press, 1985, 89

共引文献47

同被引文献39

引证文献7

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部