再论不确定法律概念之司法审查——立足于第103号行政审判指导案例的考察

Further on the Judicial Review of the Uncertain Legal Concepts ——Researching Being Established in the One Hundred and Third Administrative Judgment Guiding Case

不确定法律概念往往成为行政诉讼争议的焦点。实践中,法院消极审查可能导致行政诉讼目的难以实现,积极审查又可能干涉行政权的行使。然而,国内学者的观点——不确定法律概念可分为经验概念和价值概念,对于经验概念,法院可以进行严格审查;对于价值概念,法院应给予高度的尊重——在司法权与行政权地位明显失衡的现状下以及在实现行政诉讼目的和司法最终裁决原则的要求下,已经明显"站不住脚"了。本文通过对第103号行政审判指导案例的分析,认为应确立对所有不确定法律概念都可进行司法审查的原则,在此前提下依据对不确定法律概念进行的重新分类再确定相应的司法审查程度和司法审查标准。

The uncertain legal concepts often become the focus of argument in administrative litigation.In practice,court＇s negative review may lead to be out of the intention of administrative litigation and court＇s positive review may result in interfering to the ad- ministrative power.However,the view of in/and scholars that uncertain legal concepts can be divided into the experiential concepts and the value concepts and courts can review rigidly the experiential concepts and give the value concepts highly respect seems to be wrong.Because it is not balanced between the administrative power and the judicial power,the view does not make for achieving the intention of administrative litigation,and it is not fit for the principle of judicial finally decision.By researching the one hundred and third administrative judgment guiding case,the principle that courts can review all uncertain legal concepts should be estab- lished.We should look on the principle as a premise.Then being basedl on the reclassifying of uncertain legal concepts,corresponding degrees and standards of judicial review should be established.