期刊文献+

氯沙坦对原发性高血压伴高尿酸血症患者血清超敏C反应蛋白和尿酸浓度的影响 被引量:9

Effect of losartan on high sensitive C-reactive and uric acid of essential hypertensive patients with hyperuricemia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨氯沙坦对原发性高血压伴高尿酸血症(HUA)患者血清超敏C反应蛋白(hsCRP)和尿酸(UA)的影响及其安全性.方法 将80例高血压伴HUA患者随机分为氯沙坦组(40例)和硝苯地平组(40例),每组分别给予氯沙坦50 mg/d、硝苯地平控释片30 mg/d口服,连续治疗6个月,检测用药前、后血清hs-CRP、UA、肝肾功能、血肌酸磷酸激酶(CK)浓度及血压的变化.结果 与治疗前比较,治疗6个月后氯沙坦组与硝苯地平组的收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)均显著降低[氯沙坦组收缩压由(158.5±13.2) mmHg降至(136.7±9.4) mmHg,t=3.50,P< 0.01;舒张压由(95.6±8.4) mmHg降至(83.3±6.4) mmHg,t=3.49,P< 0.01;硝苯地平组收缩压:(157.7 ±13.9) mmHg降至(134.6±8.2)mmHg,t=3.53,P< 0.01;舒张压:(96.1 ±8.9)mmHg降至(81.2 ±6.8)mmHg,t=3.56,P< 0.01],但组间比较差异无统计学意义.氯沙坦组的血清hs-CRP、UA浓度较用药前明显下降,差异均有统计学意义[氯沙坦组hs-CRP:(5.68±1.53) mg/L降至(3.52±0.57) mg/L,t=3.82,P< 0.01;UA:(502 ±45)μmol/L降至(450 ±38) μmol/L,t=3.48,P<0.01];而硝苯地平组血清hs-CRP、UA浓度较用药前无明显变化[血清hs-CRP:(5.61±1.64) mg/L降至(5.33±1.48) mg/L,t=1.34,P> 0.05;UA:(499 ±43)μmol/L降至(489 ±42) μmol/L,t=0.68,P> 0.05].氯沙坦组患者服药前后肝肾功能、CK的变化均无显著差异,未发生严重不良事件.结论 氯沙坦能降低原发性高血压伴HUA患者的血清hs-CRP、UA浓度,治疗期间无严重不良反应,安全性良好. Objective To evaluate the influence and safety of losartan on high sensitive C-reactive protein(hs-CRP) and serum uric acid(UA) of essential high blood pressure(HBP) patients with hyperuricemia (HUA).Methods Eighty HBP patients complicated with HUA were enrolled and divided into the losartan group with losartan 50 mg/d(n =40) and the nifedipine group with nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) 30 mg/d (n =40) for 6 months continuously.The serum levels of hs-CRP,UA,hepatic and renal functions,creatine kinase(CK) and blood pressure were measured.Results Compared with before therapy,the systolic blood pressure(SBP),diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were lower in two groups after 6-month treatment and the differences were statistically significant(losartan group:SBP:(158.5 ± 13.2) mmHg vs.(136.7 ± 9.4) mmHg,t =3.50,P < 0.01 ; DBP:(95.6 ± 8.4) mmHg vs.(83.3 ± 6.4) mmHg,t =3.49,P < 0.01 ; nifedipine group:SBP:(157.7 ± 13.9) mmHg vs.(134.6 ± 8.2) mmHg,t =3.53,P < 0.01 ; DBP:(96.1 ± 8.9) mmHg vs.(81.2±6.8) mmHg,t =3.56,P <0.01).The differences in terms of systolic and diastolic blood pressure were not significant at post-treatment between losartan and nifedipine group.The serum levels of hs-CRP and UA were significantly lower after 6-month treatment than before treatment in losartan group ((5.68 ± 1.53) mg/L vs.(3.52 ± 0.57) mg/L,t =3.82,P < 0.01 ; (502 ± 45) μmol/L vs.(450 ± 38) μmol /L,t =3.48,P< 0.01),but there was no change in nifedipine group(hs-CRP:(5.61 ± 1.64) mg/L vs.(5.33 ± 1.48) mg/L,t =1.34,P > 0.05 ; UA:(499 ± 43) μmol/L vs.(489 ± 42) μmol/L,t =0.68,P > 0.05).There was no significant change regarding of liver and kidney functions and serum CK in losartan group before and after treatment.No adverse reaction occurred in the losartan group.Conclusion Losartan treatment can decrease serum hs-CRP and UA of HBP patients complicated with HUA,and there is no serious adverse reactions and good security during treatment.
作者 李波 刘微微
出处 《中国综合临床》 2014年第2期138-140,共3页 Clinical Medicine of China
关键词 氯沙坦 原发性高血压 高尿酸血症 超敏C反应蛋白 尿酸 Losartan Essential hypertension Hyperuricemia High sensitive C-reactive protein Uric acid
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献78

共引文献59

同被引文献79

  • 1孙传铎.降尿酸药物研究进展[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(1):504-504. 被引量:2
  • 2曹雪霞,王立.国产苯溴马隆治疗2型糖尿病合并高尿酸血症的疗效与安全性[J].中国新药杂志,2006,15(4):301-303. 被引量:10
  • 3Reungjui S, Roncal CA, Mu W, et al. Thiazide diuretics exacerbate Fruc- tose-induced metabolic syndrome [ J ]. J Am Soc Nephro1,2007,18 (10) : 2724 - 2731.
  • 4Sanchez-lozada LG,Tapia E, Bautista GP, et al. Effects of febuxostat on metabolic and renal alterations .in rats with fructose-induced metabolic syndrome[J]. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,2008,294(4) :710 -718.
  • 5Sautin YY, Nakagawa T, Zharikov S, et al. Adverse effects of the Classi- cal antioxidant uric acid in adipocytes:NADPH oxidase-mediated oxida- tive/nitrosative stress [ J ]. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, 2007,293 ( 2 ) : 584 - 596.
  • 6Seki S, Tsutsui K, Fujii T, et al. Association of uric acid with risk factors for chronic kidney disease and metabolic syndrome in patients with es- sential hypertension [ J]. Clin Exp Hypertens ,2010,32 ( 5 ) :270 - 277.
  • 7Serby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry Cp Jr, et al.Precursors of essential hypertension: pulmonary function, heart rate, uric acid, serum cholesterol, and other serum chemistries[J]. Am J Epidemiol, 1990, 131: 1017- 1027.
  • 8Mancia G,Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, et al. 2013ESH/ ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hyper- tension:the task force {or the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hyperten- sion(ESH)and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)[J]. Eur Heart J,2013,34(31):1281-1357.
  • 9Neutel JM. The role of combination therapy in the management of hypertension [J ]. Nephro Dial Transplant, 2006,21 (6) : 1469 - 1473.
  • 10Jin M,Yang F,Yang I,et al .Uric acid,hyperuricemia and vasculardiseases [J].Front Biosci,2012,1(17):656-669.

引证文献9

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部