试析民事合同欺诈与合同诈骗罪的区别——以一起林权转让纠纷为例

Difference between Civil Contract Fraud and Crime of Fraud of the Contract——Take a Case ofthe Forest Rights Transfer Disputes as an Example

从一起林权转让纠纷的定性为切入点,深入探讨民事合同欺诈与合同诈骗罪的含义、特征,分析二者的区别,即民事合同欺诈与合同诈骗罪在主观目的、客观表现、数额要求、法律责任等方面不同,指出执法实践中特别应注意审查欺诈行为人主体资格是否属实,弄清欺诈行为人客观上有无实际履约能力,查清欺诈行为人有无实际履约行为,核实行为人不履行合同的原因,查明行为人资金和财务流向等问题。

As transfer forest rights disputes together qualitative is the breakthrough point, this paper deeply discusses the meanings of civil contract fraud and contract fraud, characteristics, and analysis the difference between the them, namely the civil contract fraud and crime of fraud of the contract in the subjective purpose, objective performance, requirements, legal liability, and so on. This paper mainly points out that more attention should be paid to the problems of law enforcement practice, and the reason why perpetrator doesn’t carry out the contracts.