浅析历史学的“碎片化”

A Brief Analysis on the "Fragmentation" of History

关于历史学的"碎片化"问题最近受到了普遍而广泛的关注。那么我们是怎样认识"碎片化"的呢?大部分的反对碎片化的人,认为"碎片化"主要的含义是研究的方向和题目比较琐碎并且杂乱无章,对问题的认识缺乏全面的联系和融会贯通,即单独地列出一些历史现象,对各个部分之间也没有深入的思考和总结,同时也没有对整个历史事件进行具体的分析和概括,总之,就是说对历史现象无法做出深刻的分析和把握。此外,还有一种关于"碎片化"的理解,就是相对于"整体化"而言的,即是说它是整体中的一个部分或者是一个细小的碎片。正是考虑到这一点,我更想说明的是对历史学"碎片化"的研究尤为重要。

The ＆quot;fragmentation＆quot; of history has attracted wide at-tention recently. Then how is＆quot;fragmentation＆quot;recognized by peo-ple？ Most opponents of fragmentation hold that the main conno-tation of＆quot;fragmentation＆quot;is that the research direction and topic are trivial and disorganized and there is no comprehensive rela-tion and integration of the cognition, that is, just some historical phenomena are listed without a profound consideration and sum-marization of each part, let alone a specific analysis and summa-rization of the whole historical event, so in a word, a profound analysis and mastery of a certain historical phenomenon cannot be made. Besides, there is another kind of understanding of＆quot;fragmentation＆quot;, compared with＆quot;integration＆quot;, namely, it is a part or a tiny fragmentation of the whole. In this regard, the writer in-tends to point out that the research on the＆quot;fragmentation＆quot;of his-tory is particularly important.