期刊文献+

西安市文教区地表粉尘中Pb,Cd及其同位素污染特征和风险评价 被引量:1

Characteristics and Risk Evaluation of Pollution by Pb,Cd and Their Isotopes from Surface Dust in Culture and Education District in Xi′an City
下载PDF
导出
摘要 地表粉尘中重金属对人体的健康有着重要影响。采用电感耦合等离子体原子发射光谱—质谱法(ICP—MS)对西安市文教区地表粉尘中的重金属Pb和Cd的季节含量进行了测定。采用地质累积指数法分析了重金属的污染特征,并采用健康风险评价法对各污染源进行了风险评价。结果表明,西安市文教区地表粉尘中Pb和Cd的含量大部分超过陕西省土壤背景值,地质累积指数范围大部分小于1,属于无污染或轻度污染。而冬季地表粉尘中重金属污染高于其它季节,其中冬季地表粉尘中重金属Pb的区域受污染程度顺序为:东郊>西郊>北郊≈南郊,Cd的含量区域差别顺序为:东郊>南郊>北郊>西郊,在重金属Pb和Cd的3种同位素中,207Pb和112 Cd的含量最高。Pb和Cd的日均暴露剂量最大的途径是经口误食,其中镉对人体健康的危害远高于铅。 Based on the measurement of the heavy metal Pb and Cd seasonal content in the surface dust by ICP--MS in the culture and education district in Xi'an City, the article analyzed its pollution characteristics using the classification of geological cumulative pollution index, evaluated the health risks with the health risk evaluation method. The result showed that the content of the heavy metal Pb and Cd content in the sur- face dust exceeded its soil background value of the Shaanxi Province and most of the geological cumulative in- dex was smaller than 1, which belonged to the slight pollution while the pollution in winter was more serious than the other seasons, of which the contents of the metal Pb and Cd were higher in the eastern suburb while equal in the rest southern, western and northern suburbs. Among three isotopes of Pb and Cd, the content of 207pb and 112Cd were the highest. The average daily exposure intake of Pb and Cd was through mouth by mistake, and intake of Cd was more harmful than Pb.
出处 《水土保持通报》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期125-128,135,共5页 Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation
关键词 文教区 地表粉尘 重金属 风险评价 the culture and education district surface dust heavy metal risk evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1黄勇,杨忠芳,张连志,侯青叶,程新彬,赵秀芳.基于重金属的区域健康风险评价--以成都经济区为例[J].现代地质,2008,22(6):990-997. 被引量:33
  • 2黄丽,卢新卫,翟萌,罗大成.西安城市公园灰尘重金属污染及其风险评价[J].城市环境与城市生态,2010,23(1):17-20. 被引量:21
  • 3国家教育委员会.JY/T015-1996感耦等离子体原子发射光谱方法通则[S].北京:科学技术文献出版社,1997.
  • 4易秀,谷晓静,侯燕卿,刘秀花,谢娟.陕西省泾惠渠灌区土壤重金属地质累积指数评价[J].地球科学与环境学报,2010,32(3):288-291. 被引量:17
  • 5中国环境监测总站.中国土壤元素背景值[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1990..
  • 6U S EPA. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Human Health Evaluation Manual: Part A[M]. Wash- ington, D C: Office of Emergency and Remedial Re- sponse, 1989.
  • 7陈鸿汉,谌宏伟,何江涛,等.污染场地健康风险评价的理论和方法[J].地学边缘,2006,13(1):216-223.
  • 8U S Environmental Protection Agency. Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Su- perfund Sites[M]. Washington D C, Washington Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U S Environ- mental Protection Agency, 2001 : 4-24.
  • 9Mcbride M B. Cadmium concentration limits in agricul-tural soils: Weaknesses in USEPAts risk assessment and the 503 rule[J]. Human and Ecological Risk Assess-ment, 2003,9(3) :661-674.
  • 10郑袁明,陈同斌,陈煌,郑国砥,罗金发.北京市不同土地利用方式下土壤铅的积累[J].地理学报,2005,60(5):791-797. 被引量:110

二级参考文献84

共引文献802

同被引文献26

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部