期刊文献+

埃索美拉唑辅助治疗反流性食管炎16例临床疗效观察 被引量:7

Clinical efficacy of esomeprazole auxiliary treatment of 16 cases of reflux esophagitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价埃索美拉唑联合莫沙必利治疗反流性食管炎的临床疗效。方法将2010年2月至2013年3月来我院就诊的32例反流性食管炎患者随机分为两组,其中观察组16例,采用埃索美拉唑联合莫沙必利治疗,对照组16例,采用奥美拉唑联合莫沙必利治疗。观察并比较两组患者的临床疗效。结果观察组总有效率为93.75%,对照组总有效率为81.25%,两组比较差异有统计学意义,P〈0.05;两组患者治疗前主要症状积分相比差异无统计学意义,经治疗后,反酸、烧心、下咽困难及胸骨后疼痛的症状积分均较治疗前明显改善(P〈0.05);观察组不良反应的发生率为6.25%,对照组不良反应的发生率为18.75%,差异有统计学意义,P〈0.05。结论埃索美拉唑联合莫沙必利治疗反流性食管炎疗效好,值得在临床上予以推广。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy of esomeprazole combined with mosapride in the treatment of reflux esophagitis. Methods From February 2010 to March 2013, 32 patients with reflux esophagitis were randomly divided into two groups, 16 cases in each group. Observation group received esomeprazole and mosapride, while control group received omeprazole and mosapride. The efficacy of two groups was observed and compared. Results The total effective rate in observation group was 93.75%, that in control group was 81.25%, with statistical significant difference (P 〈 0.05). There was no statistical significant difference in major symptom score between two groups before treatment; after treatment, symptom scores of acid reflux, heartburn, swallowing difficulty and retrosternal pain improved significantly (P 〈 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in observation group was 6.25%, that in control group was 18.75%, with statistical significant difference (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Esomeprazole combined with mosapride in the treatment of reflux esophagitis is effective, worthy of clinical promotion.
出处 《国际医药卫生导报》 2014年第6期829-831,共3页 International Medicine and Health Guidance News
关键词 埃索美拉唑 莫沙必利 奥美拉唑 疗效 Esomeprazole Mosapride Omeprazole Efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献31

  • 1张南征,朱云,潘武,杜文琪,江兴松.质子泵抑制剂联合多潘立酮治疗反流性食管炎[J].徐州医学院学报,2004,24(4):349-351. 被引量:7
  • 2陆星华,张泰昌.反流性食管炎诊断及治疗指南(2003年)[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2004,21(4):221-222. 被引量:834
  • 3李军,吴本俨.长期质子泵抑制剂治疗老年反流性食管炎11例[J].世界华人消化杂志,2006,14(15):1524-1526. 被引量:15
  • 4杨蕊敏,郑松柏.老年人胃食管反流病的治疗[J].老年医学与保健,2007,13(1):11-12. 被引量:10
  • 5Heudebert GR, Marks R, Wilcox CM, et al. Choice of long-term strategy for the mangement of patients with severe esophagitis: acost-utility analysis. Gastroenterology, 1997, 112 (4): 1078-1086.
  • 6中华医学会消化内镜学会.返流性食管病(炎)诊断及治疗方案(试行).中华消化内镜杂志,1999,16(6):3261-3261.
  • 7DE Vault KR, Castell DO. The paramenters committee of the American college of gastroenterology. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatmeng of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol, 11999, 94:1434.
  • 8Peghini PL, Katz PO, Castell DO. Ranitidine controls nocturnal gastric acid breakthrough on omeprazole~ a controlled study in normal subjects. Gastroenterology, 1998,115:1335.
  • 9Hatlebakk JG, Katz PO, Camacho -- Lobato L, et al. Proton punp inhibitors:better acid suppression when taken befor a meal than without a meal. Aliment Pharmacol Ther,2000, 14:1267.
  • 10Nzeako UC, Murray JA. An evaluation of the clinica: implications of acid breakthrong in patients on proton pump inhibitor therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther,2002,16: 1309.

共引文献41

同被引文献73

引证文献7

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部