期刊文献+

Residual activity of cetrimide and chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis-infected root canals 被引量:5

Residual activity of cetrimide and chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis-infected root canals
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Effective final irrigation regimen is an important step in order to achieve better disinfection and ensure residual antimicrobial effects after root canal preparation. The aim of this study was to compare the residual antimicrobial activity of 0.2% cetrimide, and 0.2% and 2% chlorhexidine in root canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis. Biofilms of E. faecalis were grown on uniradicular roots for 4 weeks. After root canal preparation, root canals were irrigated with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) to remove the smear layer. The roots were randomly divided into three experimental groups (n=26) according to the final irrigating solution: Group I, 5 mL 0.2% cetrimide; Group II, 5 mL 0.2% chlorhexidine; and Group III, 5 mL 2% chlorhexidine. Samples were collected for 50 days to denote the presence of bacterial growth. The proportion of ungrown specimens over 50 days was evaluated using the nonparametric Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Differences among groups were tested using the log-rank test and the level of statistical significance was set at P〈0.05. The highest survival value was found with 2% chlorhexidine, showing statistically significant differences from the other two groups. At 50 days, E. faecalisgrowth was detected in 69.23% specimens in Groups I and II, and in 34.61% specimens of Group III. There were no significant differences between 0.2% cetrimide and 0.2% chlorhexidine. Final irrigation with 2% chlorhexidine showed greater residual activity than 0.2% chlorhexidine and 0.2% cetrimide in root canals infected with E. faecalis. Effective final irrigation regimen is an important step in order to achieve better disinfection and ensure residual antimicrobial effects after root canal preparation. The aim of this study was to compare the residual antimicrobial activity of 0.2% cetrimide, and 0.2% and 2% chlorhexidine in root canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis. Biofilms of E. faecalis were grown on uniradicular roots for 4 weeks. After root canal preparation, root canals were irrigated with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) to remove the smear layer. The roots were randomly divided into three experimental groups (n=26) according to the final irrigating solution: Group I, 5 mL 0.2% cetrimide; Group II, 5 mL 0.2% chlorhexidine; and Group III, 5 mL 2% chlorhexidine. Samples were collected for 50 days to denote the presence of bacterial growth. The proportion of ungrown specimens over 50 days was evaluated using the nonparametric Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Differences among groups were tested using the log-rank test and the level of statistical significance was set at P〈0.05. The highest survival value was found with 2% chlorhexidine, showing statistically significant differences from the other two groups. At 50 days, E. faecalisgrowth was detected in 69.23% specimens in Groups I and II, and in 34.61% specimens of Group III. There were no significant differences between 0.2% cetrimide and 0.2% chlorhexidine. Final irrigation with 2% chlorhexidine showed greater residual activity than 0.2% chlorhexidine and 0.2% cetrimide in root canals infected with E. faecalis.
出处 《International Journal of Oral Science》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2014年第1期46-49,共4页 国际口腔科学杂志(英文版)
基金 supported by the Research Group CTS-167 of the Junta de Andalucí'a, Spain
关键词 antimicrobial effects biofilms cetrimide CHLORHEXIDINE Enterococcus faecalis final irrigation residual activity antimicrobial effects biofilms cetrimide chlorhexidine Enterococcus faecalis final irrigation residual activity
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献35

  • 1Sjoren U, Figdor D, Persson S etal. Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 1997; 30(5): 297-306.
  • 2Rucucci D, Siqueira JF Jr. Biofilms and apical periodontitis: study of prevalence and association with clinical and histopatholosic findings. J Endod 2010; 36(8): 1277-1288.
  • 3Haapasalo M, Endal U, Zandi H et al. Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solution. Endod Topics 2005; 10(1): 77-102.
  • 4Siren EK, Haapasalo MPP, Ranta K et al. Microbial findings and clinical treatment procedures in endodontic cases selected for microbiological investigation. Int EndodJ 1997; 30(2): 90-95.
  • 5Sedgley CM, Lennan SL, Appelbe OK. Survival of Enterococcus faecalisin root canals ex vivo. Int Endod J 2005; 38(10): 735-742.
  • 6Chivatxaranukul P, Dashper SG, Messer HH. Dentinal tubule invasion and adherence by Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J 2008; 41( 10): 873-882.
  • 7Distel JW, Hatton JF, Gillespie MJ. Biofilm formation in medicated root canals. J Endod 2002; 28(10): 689-693.
  • 8Giardino L, Ambu E, Savoldi E etal. Comparative evatuation of antimicrobial efficacy of sodium hypochlorite, MTAD, and Tetraclan against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. J Endod2007; 33(7): 852-855.
  • 9Arias-Moliz MT, Ferrer-Luque CM, Espigares-Garcia Met aL Enterococcus faeca/is biofilms eradication by root canal irrigants. J Endod 2009; 35(5): 711-714.
  • 10Bystrom A, Sundqvist G. Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res 1981; 89(4): 321-328.

共引文献3

同被引文献18

引证文献5

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部