期刊文献+

股神经三合一复合坐骨神经阻滞用于膝部手术的临床研究 被引量:20

Comparison study of clinical effectiveness of sciatic femoral three-in-one block and sciatic lumbar plexus block for knee operation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较股神经三合一复合坐骨神经阻滞和腰丛复合坐骨神经阻滞在膝部手术的临床效果。方法择期行膝部手术患者60例,随机分为两组,分别采用股神经三合一复合坐骨神经阻滞(A组)和腰丛复合坐骨神经阻滞(B组)。记录感觉和运动阻滞起效时间,感觉、运动阻滞时间、阻滞成功率及止血带引发疼痛的情况,同时记录操作时间、操作满意度、手术的满意度及舒芬太尼使用率。结果两组感觉和运动阻滞起效时间、感觉、运动阻滞时间、阻滞成功率差异无统计学意义。A组操作时间明显短于B组,操作满意度明显高于B组(P<0.05);A组止血带引发疼痛明显高于B组,手术满意度明显低于B组,舒芬太尼使用率明显高于B组(P<0.05)。结论股神经三合一复合坐骨神经阻滞和腰丛复合坐骨神经阻滞都能满足膝部手术的镇痛需要。前者在手术满意度、耐受止血带及舒芬太尼使用上劣于后者,操作时间和操作满意度方面优于后者。 Objective To compare the clinical effectiveness of sciatic femoral three-in-one block and sciatic lumbar plexus block for knee operation.lVlethods Sixty patients undergoing knee operation were randomly divided into group A (sciatic femoral 3-in-1 block) and group 13 (sciatic lumbar plexus block) with 30 cases each. Sensory and motor block onset time, sensory and motor block durations, rate of block success and pain caused by the applied tourniquet was recorded. Time of anesthesia procedure, satisfaction of anesthesia procedure, satisfaction of operation and frequency of required sufentanil was also recorded.Results There was no difference between the group A and group B in sensory and motor block onset time, sensory and motor block durations and rate of block success. Time of anesthesia procedure was significantly shorter in the group A than in the group B, satisfaction of anesthesia procedure was significantly higher in the group A than in the group B (P〈 0. 05). Pain caused by the applied tourniquet and frequency of required sufentanil in the group A were significantly higher than that in group B (P 〈 0.05). Satisfaction of operation in group A was significantly lower than it in group B (P〈0. 05).Conclusion Both group A and group B provided sufficient analgesia for knee operation. Group B may be preferable to group A, owing to better satisfaction of operation, less pain caused by the applied tourniquet and frequency of required Sufentanil. However, group A may be preferable to group B for shorter time of anesthesia procedure and better satisfaction of anesthesia procedure.
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期163-165,共3页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
关键词 股神经三合一阻滞 腰丛阻滞 坐骨神经阻滞 神经刺激仪 Femoral three-in-one block Immbar plexus block Sciatic nerve block Nerve stimulator
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献22

  • 1徐仲煌,黄宇光,任洪智,叶铁虎,罗爱伦.神经刺激器定位神经阻滞在临床麻醉中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2001,17(5):278-279. 被引量:116
  • 2朱雁鸿,董绍兴,周琼英,廖飞,晏宏.神经刺激器定位神经阻滞在下肢手术中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(5):352-353. 被引量:9
  • 3刘万枫,王珊娟,张马忠,周仁龙,杭燕南.下肢神经阻滞在老年危重患者血管手术中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(8):595-596. 被引量:12
  • 4Wilson JL, Brown DL. Infraclavicular brachial plexus block: parasagittal anatomy important to the coracoid technique. Anesth Analg, 1998,87:870-873.
  • 5Desroches J. The infraclavicular brachial plexus block by the coracoid approach is clinically effective: an observation study of 150 patients. Can J Anesth, 2003,50:3,253-257.
  • 6Rodriguez J, Barcenal M. A comparison of single versus multiple injections on the extent of anesthesia with coracoid infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg, 2004,99:1225-1230.
  • 7Borgeat A, Ekatodramis G, Dumont C. An evaluation of the infraclavicular block via a modified approach of the Raj technique. Anesth Analg, 2001,93:436-441.
  • 8Minville V, N' Guyen L. A modified coracoid approach to infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks using a double-stimulation technique in 300 patients. Anesth Analg, 2005,100:263-265.
  • 9Zbigniew J, Koseielniak-Nielson Henrik, Rasmussen. Clinical evaluation of the lateral sagittal infraclavicular block developed by MRI studies. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2005,30:329-334.
  • 10Pither CE, Raj P, Ford DJ. The use of peripheral nerve stimulator for regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth, 1985,10: 49-58.

共引文献40

同被引文献142

引证文献20

二级引证文献132

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部