期刊文献+

基于Aspen Plus对Selexol分离CO_2流程的分析 被引量:5

Analysis of CO_2 Separation by Selexol Based on Aspen Plus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 整体煤气化联合循环发电系统可采取燃烧前捕集CO2的方法,处理的合成气量少,能耗低,且能够实现CO2的近零排放,在CO2脱除方面具有很大的优势。文中基于Aspen Plus对CO2/H2S联合脱除和分别脱除流程建立了模型,对2流程的能耗、CO2及H2S的脱除效率以及Selexol溶液的再生性能进行了分析。得出:在出口CO2纯度相同的情况下,CO2/H2S联合脱除流程的能耗仅占CO2/H2S分别脱除的21%左右,CO2脱除效率高于分别脱除流程,2流程Selexol溶液的再生性能相差不大,且H2S脱除效率也可达到95%以上,因此CO2/H2S联合脱除流程更经济。 Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC)power generation system can adopt pre-combustion CO2 capture methods, handling with less syngas and have low energy consumption, which can achieve near-zero emissions of CO2, resulting in great advantages in terms of CO2 removal. Based on Aspen Plus, combined removal of C02/H2S (CRCH) and separate removal of CO2/H2S (SRCH) were modeled . Energy consumption, capture efficiency of CO2 and H2S, as well as the regeneration performance of Selexol were analyzed by the two models. The results indicate that: while keeping the same CO2 purity in outlet stream, the energy consumption of CRCH accounts for only 21% of SRCH; the CO2 capture efficiency is^higher than that of SRCH, the regeneration performance of Selexol is almost the same for the two processes, and the capture efficiency of H2S in the two processes can be higher than 95%. All those prove that CRCH is more economic than SRCH.
出处 《中国电机工程学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第8期1231-1237,共7页 Proceedings of the CSEE
基金 国际科技合作计划项目(2010DFA24580-5)~~
关键词 CO2分离 节能 整体煤气化联合循环(IGCC) ASPEN Plus Selexol C02 separation energy consumption integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) Aspen Plus Selexol
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献65

共引文献177

同被引文献60

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部