摘要
目的 评估应用第二代双源CT新型探测器对患者进行低管电压(80 kV)冠状动脉CTA的应用价值.方法 将103例临床怀疑或已知冠心病的患者采用简单随机分组。分别以第二代双源CT普通探测器(A组)和新型探测器(B组)进行前瞻性心电触发序列扫描,A组管电压为100 kV,对原始数据进行滤波反投影(FBP)重建,B组管电压为80 kV,对原始数据进行FBP(B1组)和迭代(B2组)重建。各组CT图像的辐射剂量[CT剂量容积指数(CTDIvol)和有效剂量(ED)]以及背景噪声绝对值、主动脉根部CT值、图像信噪比(SNR)、冠状动脉近段的对比噪声比(CNR)进行系统测量.由2名放射科医师采用双盲法对每例患者冠状动脉的图像质量进行4分法评估.应用独立样本t检验比较2组患者辐射剂量(CTDIvol和ED)。应用ANOVA单因素方差分析比较A、B1和B2组主动脉根部CT值、图像噪声、SNR和冠状动脉近段CNR。应用卡方检验比较3组冠状动脉平均分可评价节段数百分比。用Kappa分析评价不同观察者冠状动脉图像质量评分的一致性。结果A组52例、B组51例患者,B组CTDIvol和ED显著低于A组,2组CTDIvol分别为(8.93 ±2.55)和(13.87 ±4.62) mGy(t =6.71,P<0.01),ED分别为(1.77±0.51)和(2.65±0.89)mSv(t =6.09,P<0.01).B1组图像噪声显著高于A组和B2组(A、B1和B2组分别为:30.52±4.45、41.17±7.68和30.91 ±6.04;F=48.75,P<0.01).B2组图像SNR(A、B1和B2组分别为:17.50±3.40、17.13±4.51和22.85±5.79,F=24.12)及冠状动脉近段CNR[A、B1和B2组分别为:(左主干)23.35±6.20、27.78±6.90、38.49±12.48,F=38.70;(右冠状动脉)23.61±6.18、28.83±6.54、39.81±11.65,F=48.77]显著高于A和B1组(P值均<0.01)。图像质量评分:A组(1.29±0.23)分,B1组(1.34±0.29)分,B2组(1.33±0.31)分;3组可评价血管段的百分比[96.9% (813/839)、96.2%(789/820)、96.5% (791/820)],差异无统计学意义(X^2=1.81,P >0.05)。结论 在装备新型整合回路探测器的第二代双源CT上应用80 kV低管电压结合迭代重建进行冠状动脉CTA检查可以显著降低放射剂量,并获得可供临床评价的图像质量。
Objective To investigate the value of low tube voltage (80 kV) for coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with normal body mass index (BMI) on 128-slice dual-source CT with novel high sensitive integrated circuit (IC) detector.Methods One hundred and three consecutive patients were scanned using prospectively ECG-triggered sequential CCTA protocol.All patients were randomly divided into group A and B.Group A was examined on a conventional 128-slice dual-source CT,while group B on a 128-slice dual-source CT with high sensitive integrated circuit detector.The tube voltage of group A was 100 kV and raw data was reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP),while tube voltage of group B was 80 kV and raw data was reconstructed with both FBP (Subgroup B1) and sonogramaffirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) (Subgroup B2).The differences in background noise,signal-tonoise ratio (SNR),contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR),CT dose index volume (CTDIvol),effective dose (ED),and image quality between the groups were compared by using t test,ANOVA and x2 test.Results There were no significant differences in age,BMI or heart rate between the two groups (Group A,n =52 vs.Group B,n =51).Radiation exposure (CTDIvol and ED) of group B was significantly lower than that of group A [(8.93 ±2.55) vs.(13.87±4.62) mGy and (1.77 ±0.51)vs.(2.65 ±0.89) mSv,t =6.71,6.09,all P 〈 0.01].SNR and CNR of proximal coronary arteries in group B2 were significantly higher than group A and B1,and there was no significant difference between the latter two.In group A,mean score of total 839 coronary artery segments was 1.29± 0.23,and the number of evaluable segments was 813 (96.9%).In group B1,mean score of total 820 coronary artery segments was 1.34 ± 0.29,and the number of evaluable segments was 789 (96.2%).In group B2,mean score of total 820 coronary artery segments was 1.33 ± 0.31,and the number of was 791 (96.5%).There were no significant differences in both mean score and percentage of evaluable segments between three groups (X^2 =1.81,P 〉 0.05).Conclusion Using 80 kV tube voltage on 128-slice dual-source CT equipped with novel integrated circuit detector and combining iterative reconstruction is feasible in patients with normal BMI,with the benefits of significantly reduced radiation dose and adequate image quality.
出处
《中华放射学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2014年第2期109-113,共5页
Chinese Journal of Radiology
基金
国家自然科学基金青年项目,北京市科技新星项目