期刊文献+

念珠菌血症合并细菌血流感染的临床与危险因素分析 被引量:6

Candidemia combined with bacterial bloodstream infection: analysis of clinical features and associated risk factors
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 回顾性分析念珠菌血症合并细菌血流感染的临床资料,探讨其临床特点及相关危险因素.方法 分析自2009年1月至2011年12月入住北京同仁医院并经血培养证实为念珠菌血症合并细菌血流感染病例的临床特征、微生物学检查及临床结局等,与同期收治的单一念珠菌血症病例进行对照分析,并应用logistic回归探讨相关危险因素.结果 共收集念珠菌血症患者42例,其中念珠菌血症合并细菌血流感染组14例,单一念珠菌血症组28例.14例念珠菌血症合并细菌血流感染患者中革兰阳性球菌感染者10例,革兰阴性杆菌感染者4例,白色念珠菌6例,光滑念珠菌4例,热带念珠菌3例,克柔念珠菌1例.单一念珠菌血症组28例中白色念珠菌12例,光滑念珠菌4例,热带念珠菌2例,克柔念珠菌1例,两组相比差异无达统计学意义(P值分别为1.000、0.266、0.178和0.608);但单一念珠菌血症组近平滑念珠菌感染者9例,念珠菌血症合并细菌血流感染组未检出.念珠菌血症合并细菌血流感染组12例出现脓毒性休克,单一念珠菌血症组为7例,差异有统计学意义(P=0.000);前者死亡10例,后者死亡15例.单因素分析结果显示,住院时间超过4周(P=0.001)、念珠菌血流感染前是否存在菌血症(P=0.005)、是否存在血液系统肿瘤(P=0.01)、是否存在腹腔感染(P=0.001)为念珠菌血症合并细菌血流感染的危险因素,但多因素回归分析显示仅住院时间超过4周为独立危险因素.结论 念珠菌血症合并细菌血流感染以革兰阳性球菌为主,易并发脓毒性休克;住院时间超过4周为念珠菌血症合并细菌血流感染的独立危险因素. Objective To investigate the clinical characteristics of and risk factors for candidemia combined with bacterial bloodstream infection (BSI) by retrospective analysis of cases.Method The clinical data of cases diagnosed as candidemia combined with BSI confirmed by blood culture were compared with those of cases with mono-candidemia in Beiing Tongren Hospital from January 2009 to December 2011.A logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the independent risk factors.Results Forty-two cases diagnosed as candidemia were analyzed including 14 cases of candidemia combined with BSI and 28 cases of mono-candidemia.Ten strains of gram-positive cocci and 4 strains of gram-negative bacilli were isolated from candidemia combined with BSI group.Six strains of C.albicans,4 strains of C.glabrata,3 strains of C.tropicalis and 1 strain of C.krosei were isolated.There was no C.parapsilosis isolated from candidemia combined with BSI group but 9 strains in the mono-candidemia group.The septic shock rate of the candidemia combined with BSI group was higher than that of the mono-candidemia group (12/14 vs 7/28,P =0.000).The mortality rate of the candidemia combined with BSI group was higher than that of the mono-candidemia group (10/14 vs 15/28),but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P =0.266).Four factors were found statistically different by univariate analysis,including hospitalization more than 4 weeks (P =0.001),bacteremia before candidemia(P =0.005),hematological tumor (P =0.01) and abdominal infection (P =0.001).Multivariate analysis showed that hospitalization more than 4 weeks was the independent risk factor.Conclusion Gram-positive cocci were the predominant species and septic shock was more common in candidemia combined with BSI.Hospitalization more than 4 weeks was the independent risk factor for candidemia combined with BSI.
出处 《中华结核和呼吸杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第2期99-103,共5页 Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
关键词 念珠菌属 真菌血症 感染 危险因素 Candida Fungemia Infection Risk factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, Data Summary from January 1992-June 2001 [J]. Am J Infect Control, 2001, 29:404-421.
  • 2Shirtliff ME, Peters BM, Jabra-Rizk MA, et al. Cross-kingdom interactions : Candida albicans and bacteria [ J ]. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 2009, 299 : 1-8.
  • 3Ascioglu S, Rex JIf, de Pauw B, et al. Defining opportunistic invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplants: an international consensus[ J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2002, 34:7-14.
  • 4Kim SH, Yoon YK, Kim M J, et al. Risk factors for and clinical implications of mixed Candida/bacterial bloodstream infections [ J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2013, 19:62-68.
  • 5Matthew M, Victora J, Matin H. Delaying the empiric treatment of Candida bloodstream infection until positive blood culture results are obtained: a potential risk factor for hospital mortality [ J ]. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2005, 49:3640-3645.
  • 6Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physician/Society of Critical Care Medicine[J]. Chest, 1992, 101:1644-1655.
  • 7Leon C, Ruiz-Santana S, Saavedra P, et al. A bedside scoring system ( " Candida score ") for early antifungal treatment in nonneutropenic critically ill patients with Candida colonization [J]. Crit Care Med, 2006, 34:730-737.
  • 8Leon C, Ruiz-Santana S, Saavedra P, et al. Usefulness of the "Candida score" for discriminating between Candida colonization and invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill patients: a prospective multicenter study [J]. Crit Care Med, 2009, 37:1624-1633.
  • 9Klotz SA, Gaur NK, De Armond R, et al. Candida albicans Als proteins mediate aggregation with bacteria and yeasts[J]. Med Mycol, 2007, 45:363-370.
  • 10Burchard KW, Minor LB, Slotman GJ, et al. Fungal sepsis in surgical patients[ J]. Arch Surg, 1983, 118:217-221.

同被引文献50

引证文献6

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部