期刊文献+

新加坡住房政策的发展进程及效果评价 被引量:4

Evolution and Effectiveness Evaluation of the Housing Policy in Singapore
下载PDF
导出
摘要 新加坡住房问题在殖民地时代长期存在并遭受忽视;独立后,新加坡政府不断致力于解决住房问题,并且将之当成构建典范国家的工具。通过长期强有力的政策干预,新加坡政府建立了以中央公积金为主要资金支持、以住房开发局为主导供应方式和以自有住房为主要权属的独具特色的住房政策体系。花园般的居住环境、较高的住房自有率、对经济发展和族群融合的促进以及效率与公平的兼顾等显示了新加坡住房政策干预的成功,在住房政策领域,新加坡可称为"资产建设"的典范。然而,新加坡住房政策也存在公共住房过度投资、损害中央公积金养老功能以及收入分配差距较大等消极效果。 Singapore's housing problems has existed and ignored during the colonial era. After the independence, solving the housing problem has been committed by the Singapore Government and has been served as a tool to es- tablish a new and model state. With long-term powerful policy interventions, Singapore goverment has established a unique housing policy system with the Central Provident Fund as financial support, the Housing Development Bu- reau as the leading provision role, and the owner-occupied housing as the main tenure choice. The garden-like resi- dential environment, higher homeownership rates, strong supports for economic development and ethnic harmony and so on, all demonstrate the success of Singapore's housing policy interventions, and Singapore can indeed be named the model of "asset-building policy" for housing policy. Even so, Singapore's housing policy has negative effects, such as over-investment in public housing, the Fund, and the larger income gap. damage of the pension function of the Central Provident
作者 何洪静
出处 《东南亚研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期20-26,共7页 Southeast Asian Studies
基金 广东省教育厅2013年高等学校教学质量与教学改革工程项目“基于综合能力培养取向的社会工作本科专业教学模式构建”(粤教高函〔2013〕113号)
关键词 新加坡 住房问题 住房政策 效果 Singapore Housing Problem Housing Policy Effectiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Brenda S.A. Yeoh, "From Colonial Neglect to Post- Independence Heritage: the Housing Landscape in the Central Ar- ea of Singapore", City & Society, 2000, Vol. 12, No. 1, p. 103.
  • 2Hans-Dieter, " Urbanization and Urban Conflict in Southeast Asia", Asian Survey, 1975, Vol. 15, No. 9, p. 775.
  • 3David Kim Hin Ho and Eddie Chi Man Hui, "Public Housing Policy: The Gradual Privatization of the HDB (Housing and Development Board) Mortgage Loan", Property Manage- ment, 2008, Vol. 26, No. 3, p. 152.
  • 4Alwyn Young, "A Tale of Two Cities: Factor Accu- mulation and Technical Change in Hong Kong and Singapore", Annual 1992, No. 7, pp. 21 - 22.
  • 5迈克尔.谢若登.美国及世界各地的资产建设[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(1):23-29. 被引量:25
  • 6David McCarthy, Olivia S. Mitchell, and John Pig- gott, "Asset Rich and Cash Poor: Retirement Provision and Housing Policy in Singapore", Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 2002, Vol. 1, No. 3, p. 197.
  • 7Mubammad Faishal Ibrahim and Ying Wei See, "Public Housing Choices in Singapore: Planning Implications", 39th IsoCaRP Congress 2003, pp. 3 - 4.
  • 8Gary S. Fields, "Changing labor market conditions and Economic Development in Hong Kong, the Republic of Ko- rea, Singapore, and Taiwan, China", The World Bank Economic Review, 1994, Vol. 8, No. 3, p. 395.
  • 9Giok Ling Ooi, "National Identity, Public Housing and Conservation in Singapore", Habitat Irtternational, 1994,Vol. 18, No. 2, p. 71.
  • 10Belinda Yuen, "Squatters No More: Singapore Social Housing", Global Urban Development 2007, 3 ( 1 ), http: // www. globalurban, org/GUDMag07Vol3Issl/Yuen, htm, 2014 - 01 - 08.

二级参考文献57

  • 1C. Mary Turnbull. A History of Singapore 1918-1975[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1979:15.
  • 2潘玲.海外华人百科全书[M].香港:三联书店有限公司,1998:204.
  • 3曾玲.越洋再建家园[M].南昌:江西高校出版社,2003:8.
  • 4南洋商报.新加坡一百五十年[M].新加坡:南洋商报,1969:135.
  • 5Diang K. Mauzy and R. S. Milne. Singapore Politics Under the People's Action Party[M]. London: Rortledge Publishing Press, 2002.
  • 6Yue-man Yeung and D. W. Drakakis Smish. Comparative Perspectives on Public Housing in Singapore and Hong Kong[J]. Asian Survey, 1974(3).
  • 7李光耀.李光耀回忆录(下)[M].新加坡:新加坡联合早报,2000.
  • 8Lee Kuan Yow. From Third World to First: The Singapore Story :1965 - 2000[M]. Times Media Private Ltd, 2000 : 116 - 118.
  • 9Loo Lee Sim. Public Housing and Ethnic Integration in Singapore[J]. Habitat International,2003(2).
  • 10Michael Hill and Lian Kwen Fwen. Nation Building and Citizenship in Singapore[M]. London:Routledge Publishing Press, 1995:118.

共引文献36

同被引文献29

  • 1钟汉明.卓有成效的新加坡住房制度[J].东南亚研究,1994(Z2):26-27. 被引量:4
  • 2宋培军,张秋霞.试论新加坡住房市场的体制特点及其成因[J].当代亚太,2004(8):57-62. 被引量:7
  • 3[5]《道德价值:一个朝气蓬勃国家的根基--吴作栋总理在1994年国庆群众大会上的演讲》,新加坡《联合早报》,1994年8月22日.
  • 4《吴总理:新加坡政治是托管式民主模式》.《联合早报》(新加坡),1995年9月18日.
  • 5李光耀.《李光耀1984年国庆群众大会上的讲话》,《联合早报》1984年8月.
  • 6宋培军,张秋霞.《试论新加坡住房制度的形成背景及其特点》,《北大亚太研究》2004年第6期.
  • 7宋培军,张秋霞.《新加坡"住房问题政治化"现象析论》,《中国社会科学院青年学术报告》第2卷,社会科学文献出版社2007年版.
  • 8宋培军.《住房干预的东亚模式--新加坡,香港政府进行经济干预的途径分析》,钱乘旦总主编,董正华主编.《世界现代化历程(东亚卷)》,凤凰出版传媒集团,江苏人民出版社2010年版.
  • 9《海峡时代》(The Straits Times)1982年9月2日.
  • 10《民主不纯粹是推行一人一票制》,《联合早报》1992年10月23日.

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部