论医学会开展医疗损害技术鉴定的可行性

Feasibility of Medical Association to Carry Out Technical Appraisal of Medical Damage

长期以来,各级医学会承担着医疗事故鉴定的职能,但同时也存在着一些问题。各种因素导致了医疗鉴定存在双轨制的现象。《侵权责任法》实施后,在民事领域以"医疗损害"取代了"医疗事故"的概念,社会上对医学会医疗鉴定职能产生了疑问。目前在国家层面并未给出一个权威而明确的答案,导致实践中对此问题的犹豫和困惑。作为过渡,各地应当在现阶段出台暂时性的规定,维护医学会鉴定职能的继续行使。未来,医疗损害鉴定体制应当统一。但医疗专家不应被轻易否定,仍应当在医疗损害鉴定工作中承担主要角色。

For a long time,all levels of Medical assume the functions of Malpractice,but there are also some problems. A variety of factors led to the existence of two-tier phenomenon on medical identification. After the implementation of Tort Law ,in the civil sphere as ＂medical harm＂ instead of ＂malpractice＂ concept, community on the Medical Association medical identification functions into question. Currently at the national level did not give an authoritative and clear answer,as a result of this issue hesitation and confusion in prac- tice. As a transition, all levels of Medical Association should be introduced the temporary regulations at this stage, maintaining Medical Association to continue to exercise the functions of identification. In future, the medical damage identification system should be harmo- nized. However, medical experts should not be easily denied, should still assume a major role in the medical damage identification.