体育仲裁先例论——CAS仲裁经验的中国化

Precedent in Sport Arbitration ——Enlightenment of CAS Arbitral Experience for China

仲裁先例在体育立法缺失的背景下,通过整合立法与司法功能有助于弥补规则与实践差距,建构体育法则,提升体育实践透明度,促成体育法制统一化。国际体育仲裁院(CAS)仲裁独特的上诉等级制、裁决公开制、仲裁权威性以及作为专门化仲裁而致管辖事项的重复性,在国际体育领域建构了仲裁先例的生长条件。我国体育实践生机勃勃,但因经验缺乏及体育法则的陈旧,致使实践乱象渐生。应建构中国体育仲裁机构并赋予其先例创设功能,通过立法与司法功能的统合整顿体育秩序。

The arbitral precedent eliminates the differences between rules and practice, establish the sport rules, promote the transparency of sport activities, and enhance the uniformity of sport laws while the legislative bodies in sport circle are absent. CAS system creates precedent-friendly conditions in the international sport field because of its unique characteristics, including the appeal hierarchy, published awards, authority, and the frequency of similar disputes due to its professional nature. Although the sport practice in China develops rapidly, the disorder is inevitable due to the lack of experiences and the obsolescence of sport laws. The Chinese Court of Arbitration for Sport should be established and empowered the privileges to build up the precedents; by integrating the duties of legislative and judicial bodies it could foster the sport order.