摘要
从国际学术理论研究来看,对自然资源与经济增长关系研究有两种主流研究范式即"荷兰病"研究范式和"资源诅咒"研究范式。从两种研究范式的比较中可以看出,在研究对象、研究内容、研究方法、研究价值取向等方面均存在着差异。从"资源诅咒"研究范式替代"荷兰病"研究范式的本质、研究结论和价值取向,以及从广大发展中国家发展实践和研究现状上看,"荷兰病"研究范式不会简单地被"资源诅咒"研究范式所替代,至少从发展中国家视角来看,"荷兰病"研究范式仍然还有重要的理论研究价值和经济实践意义。
From the view of international academic theoretical research, paradigm of research on the relationship between natural resources and economic growth can be classified into Dutch Disease and Resource Curse. Differ- ences between them are in terms of research objectives, contents, methodology and value orientation. From the es- sence, conclusion and value orientation of the replacement of Dutch Disease with Resource Curse, the practice of development in the developing countries and the current situation of related researches, we can see that the research paradigm of Dutch Disease can not easily be replaced by Resource Curse; at lease, from the view of developing countries, the research paradigm of Dutch Disease is of great value of theoretical research and great economic prac- tical significance.
出处
《经济问题》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第3期6-10,46,共6页
On Economic Problems
基金
北京市教委2011年度人才强教深化计划项目"京津冀地区贸易与经济发展模式研究"学术创新团队(PHR201106139)部分研究成果
关键词
荷兰病
资源诅咒
研究范式
演进趋势
Dutch Disease
Resource Curse
research paradigm
evolution trend