期刊文献+

完整结肠系膜切除联合中央血管结扎技术在右侧结肠癌术中应用探讨 被引量:1

Discussion on application of complete mesocolic excision united central vascular ligation in right radical colonectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨完整结肠系膜切除(complete mesocolic excision,CME)联合中央血管结扎(central vascular ligation,CVL)技术在右侧结肠癌手术治疗中的应用效果。方法回顾分析32例右侧结肠癌CME联合CVL技术的临床资料,并与常规手术组比较。结果两组均无切口感染及吻合口瘘并发症,对照组有1例患者出现粘连性肠梗阻;CME组32例结肠系膜均完整,无破损,对照组30例中有18例结肠系膜破损,两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=13.408;P<0.001);CME联合CVL组淋巴结清扫平均数(14.2±2.6)枚,对照组为(8.3±1.9)枚,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=36.54;P<0.001),其中CME联合CVL组淋巴结阳性率为42.3%,对照组为37.8%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 CME能保证结肠系膜的完整切除、同时能收获更多的淋巴结,有利于结肠癌的根治性完整切除。 Objective To investigate the effect of complete mesocolic excision(CME) united central vascular ligation(CVL) in right hemicolectomy for colonic cancer. Methods Retrospective analysis the clinical data of 32 patients with right hemicolectomy for colonic carcinoma undergoing CME combined with CVL,and compared with control group of 30 patients with underwent tradi-tional radical resection. Results The two groups had no incision infection and anastomotic leakage. 1 patient had intestinal ob-struction of adhesion in control group,32 cases of mesocolon were complete resected in CME combined with CVL group,18 cases of mesocolon were not complete resected in the control group,the difference has statistical significant (χ2=13.408,P〈0.001);The average number of lymph nodes harvested for CME combined with CVL group was 14.2±2.6,and the control group was 8.3±1.9, the difference has statistical significance too (t=36.54,P〈0.001). Lymph node positive rate in CME combined with CVL group was 42.3%,while the control group was 37.8%, but there was no statistical significance(P〉0.05). Conclusion CME technique for colon cancer can achieveen bloc resection of mesocolon,and have optimal lymph nodes harvest,which is conducive to complete resection of colon cancer.
出处 《江西医药》 CAS 2014年第1期15-16,共2页 Jiangxi Medical Journal
关键词 完整结肠系膜切除 中央血管结扎 结肠癌 Complete mesocolon resection Central vascular ligation Colon cancer
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Hohenberger W,Weber K,Matzel K,et al. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer:complete mesocolic excision and central ligation- technical notes and outcome [J]. Tech Coloproctol,2010,14(Suppl 1 ) : S49-51.
  • 2West NP,Hohenberger W,Weber K,et al. Complete mesocolic ex- cision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically su- perior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2009,11 (4) : 354-364.
  • 3Pramateftakis MG. Optimizing colonic cancer surgery :high ligati0n and complete mesocolic excision during right hemicolectomy [J]. Dan Med Bull,2010,57(12):A4224.
  • 4Eiholm S,Ovesen H. Total mesocolic excision versus traditional re- section in right-sided colon cancer-method and increased lymph node harvest[J]. J Clin Onco1,2010,28(2):272-8.
  • 5叶颖江,高志冬,王杉,尹慕军,杨晓东,梁斌,姜可伟,董令仪.完整结肠系膜切除在结肠癌手术治疗中的应用[J].中国实用外科杂志,2011,31(6):494-496. 被引量:106
  • 6秦章禄,郭朝阳.43例腹腔镜结直肠肿瘤根治手术体会[J].江西医药,2011,46(1):38-39. 被引量:4

二级参考文献13

  • 1Jocobs M,Verdeja J C,Goldstein H S.Minimally invasive colon re-section.Surg endosc,1991,1:144.
  • 2Lujan G,Pasencia M,Jacobs M,et al.Long term survival after la-paroscopic colon resection for cancer:complete five years follow up.Dis Colon Rectum,2002,45:491.
  • 3Lacy AM,Garcia,Valdeccasas JC,Delgado S,et al.Laparoscopy-as-sisted Colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastic colon cancer:a randomized trial.Lancet,2002,359:2224.
  • 4Allendorf JDF,Bessler M,Whelan R L,et al.Better preservation of immune fuction after laparoscopic-assisted Vs open bowel resection in a murine model.DiscolonRectum,1996,10:67.
  • 5The MRC CLASICC trial group.Short-term endpoints of convention-al versus laparoscopicassisted surgery in patients with colorectal can-cer.(MRC CLASICC trial):multicentre,randomised controlled trial.Lancet,2005,365(9472):1718.
  • 6Frasson M,Braga M,Vignali A,et al.Benefits of laparoscopic col-orectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients.Dis Colon Rectum,2008,51(3):296.
  • 7The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group.A compar-ison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.N Engl J Med,2004,350(20):2050.
  • 8Fleshman J,Sargent DJ,Green E,et al.Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST study group trial.Ann Surg,2007,246(4):655.
  • 9Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, et al. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocohc excision and central liga- tion--technical notes and outcome [Jl. Colorectal Dis,2009,11 (4):354-364.
  • 10West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, et al. Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcino- ma of the colon[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2010,28(2):272-278.

共引文献108

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部