期刊文献+

基于价值-风险双准则的风险决策理论 被引量:15

A New Risk Decision-making Theory:Based on Value and Risk
原文传递
导出
摘要 风险决策问题一直是管理学、心理学和经济学十分关注的重要研究领域。本文对重要的风险决策理论进行回顾,根据已有的研究成果,分析并提出本文研究的理论基础:多重参照点、风险认知和决策多准则。本文将个体决策的参照点归纳为期望参照点和厌恶参照点,并将风险界定为决策事件的未来可能状态与期望参照点发生负偏离的综合,即价值的负偏离和概率的负偏离。在此基础上,论文提出了价值最大化-风险最小化双准则的风险决策理论,给出风险测算方法,及基于期望价值和风险的综合决策值公式。最后,应用该决策理论对经典决策悖论进行了消解,并应用典型的决策实验数据对理论进行验证,结果表明本文所提出的风险决策理论具有很强的解释性。 Risk decision-making is an important research field of management, psychology and economics. By reviewing and analyzing the classical risk decision-making theories, multiple reference points, risk per- ception and multi-criteria decision-making are poposed as the theoretical basis. Then, the reference points in decision-making are categorized as expected reference point and disgusting reference point, and risk is defined as the negative deviation between the future state of decision incidents and the expectation refer- ence point. In the light of the above, a risk decision-making theory based on value maximization and risk minimization, together with risk evaluation method and an integrated decision model based on expectation value and risk, is developed in this paper. Finally, the decision theory is tested on classical decision-mak- ing paradoxes and some decision-making examples. And the testing results prove the proposed risk deci- sion-making theory is strongly explanatory to risk decision-making.
出处 《中国管理科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期42-50,共9页 Chinese Journal of Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71171146) 天津市哲学社会科学规划基金资助项目(TJGL12-041)
关键词 决策 参照点 价值 风险 decision-making reference point value risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1李纾,毕研玲,梁竹苑,孙彦,汪祚军,郑蕊.无限理性还是有限理性?--齐当别抉择模型在经济行为中的应用[J].管理评论,2009,21(5):103-114. 被引量:22
  • 2Bernoulli D. Exposition of a new theory on the measure- ment of risk[J]. Econometrica, 1954,22 (1) : 23 - 36.
  • 3Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of games and economic behavior[M]. Princeton N J:Princeton Uni- versity Press, 1944.
  • 4Savage L J. The foundations of statistics[M]. New York : John Wiley & Sons, 1954.
  • 5Quiggin J. A theory of anticipated utility[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1982,3 (4) : 323 - 343.
  • 6Glimcher P W, Dorris M C, Bayer H M. Physiological utility theory and the neuroeconomics of choice [J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2005,52 (2) : 213 - 256.
  • 7Kahneman D, Tverskey A. Prospect theory: An analy- sis of decision under risk[J]. Econometriea, 1979,47 (2) : 263- 291.
  • 8Tverskey A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice [J]. Science, New Series, 1981,211(4481) :453-458.
  • 9Tverskey A, Kahneman D. Rational choice and the framing of decisions[J]. The Journal of Business, 1986, 59(4) : 251- 278.
  • 10Tverskey A, Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theo- ry: Cumulative representation of uncertainty[J]. Jour- nal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992,5 (4) : 297 - 323.

二级参考文献140

同被引文献174

引证文献15

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部