期刊文献+

概念整合理论视阈下挽联的认知阐释

Elegiac Couplet Analysis from Cognitive Interpretation of CIT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 概念整合是一系列的认知活动,将不同空间的输入信息进行彼此映射的最优化选择,提取各自最契合的意义整合起来而成为一个新的概念结构。挽联隶属于中国对联文化,或总括一生,或遗言传志,具有深刻的文化意义。概念整合理论的发展日趋成熟,而暂鲜有将其运用于对联领域,文章针对概念整合理论在挽联领域的研究现状,结合概念整合理论所特有的认知网络模型,从挽联的语音、词语、小句及篇章四个方面对挽联进行认知阐释,以期为挽联的研究提供新视角。 Abstract : The Conceptual Integration is a series of cognitive activity. It can take optimization selection of mappings into input information from different spaces, then, choose correct meaning from each space to form a new conceptual structure. Elegiac couplet belongs to Chinese couplets culture, it is used to summarize lifetime or record last testament and morale heritage. It has profound cultural significance. The development of conceptual blending theory is gradually mature, but it is used in this domain few times. So, according to research status of elegiac couplet from the perspective of conceptual blending theory, combining with cognitive network models in conceptual blending theory, the paper interpreted elegiac couplet from aspects of phonetics,word, syntax and discourse, as to provide a new perspective for the research of elegiac couplet.
作者 杨欢 夏日光
出处 《中州大学学报》 2014年第1期68-72,共5页 Journal of Zhongzhou University
关键词 概念整合理论 挽联 映射 conceptual blending theory elegiac couplet mapping
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1苏晓军,张爱玲.概念整合理论的认知力[J].外国语,2001,24(3):31-36. 被引量:150
  • 2Langacker R. Concept, Image&Symbol [ J ]. CognitiveLinguis- tics ,2002 (9).
  • 3Faueonnier G. &Turner. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind' s Hidden Complexities [ M ]. New York : Basic Books ,2002.
  • 4吴为善.汉语韵律框架及其词语整合效应[M].上海:学林出版社.2010.
  • 5郭沫若.论节奏[C]//文艺论集.上海:光华书局,1925.
  • 6Sinha C. Blending out of the background: Play, props and staging in the material world [ J I. Journal of Pragmaties, 2005,37(10).
  • 7吕俊昌.康有为痛悼“六君子”[J].中学历史教学参考,1997,0(7):36-36. 被引量:1

二级参考文献14

  • 1Holyoak, K. J. & P. Thagard. Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction[J]. Cognitive Science, 1989, (13): 295-355.
  • 2Indurkhya, B.. Metaphor and Cognition: An Interactionist Approach[M]. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1992.
  • 3Johnson-Laird, E N.. Mental Models[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
  • 4Kahneman, D.. Varieties of counterfactual thinking [A]. Roese, N. J. & J. M. Olson. What Might Have Been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking[C]. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1995.
  • 5Schwartz, D. L. & J. B. Black. Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fallback[J]. Cognitive Science, 1996, (20): 457-497.
  • 6van Dijk, T. A.. Text and Context[M]. Longman, 1977.
  • 7Coulson, S.. Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending [D]. UCSD Ph. D. dissertation, 1997.
  • 8Fauconnier, G.. Mappings in Thought and Language [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  • 9Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. Blending as a central process of grammar[A]. Goldberg, A.. Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language[C]. Stanford:Center for the Study of Language and Information,1996.
  • 10Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. Conceptual integration networks[J]. Cognitive Science, 1998, (22/2): 133-187.

共引文献149

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部