期刊文献+

血管内支架结合弹簧圈栓塞治疗对颅内动脉瘤患者血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶和S100B蛋白的影响 被引量:5

Influence of endovascular stent coil embolization on serum NSE and SIOOB protein in patients with intracra- nial aneurysms
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨血管内支架结合弹簧圈栓塞治疗对颅内动脉瘤患者血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)和S100B蛋白的影响。方法86例颅内动脉患者按数字表法随机分为观察组43例和对照组43例。观察组采用血管内支架结合弹簧圈栓塞治疗,对照组采用显微夹闭治疗。对两组患者的近远期疗效进行分析,且测定两组患者治疗前后的血清NSE和S100B蛋白并比较。结果两组近期好转率均为100.0%,差异无统计学意义(X^2=0.00,P〉0.05)。观察组远期优良率为100.0%,高于对照组的90.7%(X^2=4.06,P〈0.05)。对照组治疗后血清NSE和S100B蛋白均有明显升高(t=2.725、2.076,均P〈0.05),观察组治疗后血清NSE和S100B蛋白均低于对照组(t=2.925、2.246,均P〈0.05)。结论血管内支架结合弹簧圈栓塞治疗对颅内动脉瘤患者血清NSE和S100B蛋白影响较小。 Objective To explore the influence of endovascular stent coil embolization on serum neuron-specific enolase(NSE) and S100B protein in patients with intracranial aneurysms. Methods 86 patients with intracranial aneurysms were randomly divided into the observation group(43 cases) and the control group(43 cases). The patients in the observation group were operated through endovascular stent coil embolization, while the patients in the control group were operated through microscopic clipping. Near and long-term effects were analyzed. Serum NSE and S100B protein were measured before and after treatment. Results The recent improvement rate of the two groups was 100% ,there was no significant difference( X2 = 0.00 ,P 〉 0.05 ). The long-term excellent rate of the observation group was 100%, which was significantly higher than 90.7% of the control group ( X^2 = 4.06, P 〈 0. 05 ). After treatment, the serum NSE and SIOOB protein of the control group were significantly increased( t = 2. 725,2.076, all P 〈 0. 05 ), which were significantly higher than those of the observation group ( t = 2. 925,2. 246, all P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion The serum NSE and S100B protein were less affected through endovascular stent coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms.
出处 《中国基层医药》 CAS 2014年第4期501-503,共3页 Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词 颅内动脉瘤 神经元特异性烯醇化酶 S100B蛋白 Intracranial aneurysms Intervention Neuron-specific enolase S100B protein
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1许燕凯,郑少钦,赖润龙,蔡楚伟,李王安.两种方法治疗颅内动脉瘤疗效比较[J].中国基层医药,2012,19(6):848-849. 被引量:6
  • 2Hu YY,Dong XQ,.Yu WH,et al. Change in plasma SIOOB leve after acute spontaneous basal ganglia hemorrhage [ J ]. Shock, 2010,33 (2) : 134-140.
  • 3朱成明,姚文华,王贵富,张德明.颅内动脉瘤外科治疗的临床疗效对比分析[J].四川医学,2012,33(8):1400-1403. 被引量:2
  • 4Birehall D, Khangure M, McAuliffe W, et al. Endovascular man- agement of acute subarachnoid haemorrhage in the elderly[ J]. Br J Neurosurg,2009,15 (4) : 35-38.
  • 5Koivisto T,Vanninen R,Hurskainen H,et al. Outcomes ofearly endo- vaseular versus surgical treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms IR prospective randomized study [ J ]. Stroke ,2008,31 ( 10 ) :2369-2377.
  • 6Taba MM, Nakabara I, Higashi T, et al. Endovascular embolization vs surgical clipping in treatment of cerebral aneurysms:morbidity and mortality with 8h0n-term outcome[ J]. Surg Neurol,2009,66 (3) :277-284.
  • 7汪凯,孟庆海,刘霞,孟承东,李国彬.颅内动脉瘤破裂急性期血管夹闭术与血管内栓塞术疗效对比观察[J].山东医药,2009,49(46):76-77. 被引量:14
  • 8Tandhardt H, Boecher-Schwarz H, Gruber A, et al. Endovascular treatment of unrnptured intracranial aneurysms with uglielmi de- tachable coils:short-and long-term results of a ingle-centre series [ J ]. Stroke,2008,39 (9) : 899-904.
  • 9Gallas S, Drouineau J, Gabrillargues J, et al. Feasibility,procedur- al morbidity and mortality, and long-term follow-up of ndovascular treatment of 321 unmptured aneurysms [ J ]. Am Jeuroradial, 2008,29( 1 ) :63-68.
  • 10Sforza DM, Putman CM, Cebral JR. Hemodynamics of cerebral an- eurysms[ J]. Annu Rev Fluid Mech,2009,41 ( 1 ) :91-107.

二级参考文献30

  • 1叶劲,曾敬初.颅内动脉瘤的治疗与预后进展[J].右江民族医学院学报,2005,27(5):729-731. 被引量:2
  • 2梁国标,魏学忠,李志清,熊剑,韩松.早期显微手术治疗颅内动脉瘤破裂(附216例分析)[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2005,10(11):499-500. 被引量:13
  • 3Dovey Z, Misra M, Thornton J, et al. Guglielmi detachable coiling for intracranial aneurysms:the story so far[J]. Arch Neurol,2001, 58(4) :559-564.
  • 4Gary J, Redekop. Microsurgical clipping or endovascular coiling for ruptured cerebral aneurysms[ J]. Stroke,2006,37(6) :1352-1353.
  • 5Gravesv B, Stmther CM, Duffta, et al. Early treatment of ruptured aneurysms with guglielmi detachable coils: effeet on subsequent bleeding [J]. Neurosurgery,1995,37(4) : 640-648.
  • 6Frank C,Tong,Harry J,ct al. Endovascular treatment of intracranial tmeurysms with guglielmi detachable coils: emphasis on new techniques[J]. J Clin Ncurosci,2000,7(3) :244-253.
  • 7Koivisto T,Vanninen R,Hurskainen H,et al. Outcomes of early endovascular versus surgical treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms:a prospective randomized study[J]. Stroke,2000,31 (10) : 2369-2377.
  • 8Taha MM, Nakahara I, Higashi T, et al. Endovaseular embolization vs surgical clipping in treatment of cerebral aneurysms: morbidity and mortality with short-term outcome [ J ]. Surg Neurol, 2006,66 (3) :277-284.
  • 9Helland, Christian A, Krakenes, et al. A population-based study of neurosurgical and endovascular treatment of ruptured, intracranial aneurysms in a small neurosurgieal unit[ J]. Neurosurgery ,2006,59 (6) :1168-1176.
  • 10Brilstra ET,Rinkel GJ,Algra A,et al.Rebleeding,secondary ischemia,and timing of operation in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage[J].Neurology,2000,55(11):1656-1660.

共引文献19

同被引文献66

  • 1杨咏波,黄玉杰,刘翼,游潮,孙剑涛,那世杰,王斌,施圣晖.球囊成形支架置入术治疗椎动脉开口狭窄[J].华西医学,2008,23(5):1092-1093. 被引量:9
  • 2王艳玲,王大明,张分明,宋信英,耿怀旺.双侧椎动脉狭窄的血管内治疗及其随访研究[J].中原医刊,2006,33(24):40-42. 被引量:5
  • 3靳峰,刘春华,郭守刚,赵洪洋,赵甲山.早期康复治疗对脑出血患者微创清除术后神经功能和日常生活能力的影响[J].中国康复医学杂志,2007,22(8):721-723. 被引量:17
  • 4Gross PL, Weitz JI. New anticoagulants for treatment of venous thmmboembolism [J].Arterioscler Thromb Vase Biol, 2008,28 (3) :380-386.
  • 5Coward LJ, Featherstone RL, Brown MM. Pereutaneous translumi- hal angioplasty and stenting for vertebral artery stenosis [ J ]. Co- ehrane Database Syst Rev,2005,36 ( 2 ) : 2047 -2048.
  • 6Jiang WJ, Xu XT, Du B, etal. Long-term outcome of elective stenting for symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar stenosis [ J ]. Neurology ,2007,68 ( 11 ) :856-858.
  • 7Weber W, Mayer TE, Henkes BK, et al. Efficacy of stent angio- plasty for symptomatic stenoses of the proximal vertebral artery[J]. Eur J Radio1,2005,56 ( 2 ) :240-247.
  • 8TsutsumiM, Kazekawa K, Onizuka M, et al. Stent fracture in re- vascularization for symptomatic ostial vertebral artery stenosis [J]. Neuroradiology ,2007,49( 1 ) :253-257.
  • 9Lugmayr H, Kastner M, Frohler W, et al. Sirolimuseluting stents for the treatment of symptomatic extranial vertebral artery steno- sis:early experience and 6-month follow-up[ J ]. Rofo,2004,176 ( 5 ) : 1430-1435.
  • 10Abuqureeque FC, Fiorella D, Han P, et al. A reappraisal of angio- plasty and stenting for the treatment of vertebral origin stenosis. Neurosurgery,2003,53 ( 3 ) : 607-614.

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部