期刊文献+

不同浓度臭氧腰椎旁间隙注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床观察 被引量:6

Clinical Observation of Lumbar Parapharyngeal Space Injection of Different Concentrations of Ozone in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同浓度臭氧椎旁间隙注射在腰椎间盘突出症患者中的疗效。方法132例腰椎间盘突出症患者随机均分为A、B、C三组。每组44例,均给予臭氧腰椎旁间隙注射治疗,A组浓度为25μg/ml,B组为40μg/ml,C组为60/,g/ml,注射量均为10~15ml,对比i组患者治疗效果。结果B组患者术后3个月、6个月及12个月时的优良率均显著高于A、C丽组(P〈0.01);三组患者治疗后视觉模拟评分法(visualanaloguescore,VAS)均显著低于治疗前(P〈0.01);且B组显著低于A、C两组(P〈0.01或P〈0.05)。结论臭氧腰椎旁间隙注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效确切,安全可靠,但40μg/ml浓度的臭氧对于该病的治疗效果更佳。 Objective To study the clinical effects of lumbar parapharyngeal space injection of different eoncentra tions of ozone in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods A total of 132 LDH patients were randomly di- vided into group A (n = 44), group I3 (n = 44), and group C (n = 44). All the patients were treated with lumbar parapha- ryngeal space injection of 10-15 ml ozone with the concentrations as 25μg/ml in group A, 40 μg/ml in group B, and 60μg/ml in group C. The clinical effects were contrasted between the three groups. Results The excellent rate in group B was significantly higher than that in group A and C 3, 6, and 12 months after the treatment (P〈0.01). Visual ana logue scores (VASs) in all the groups were significantly lower than before (P〈0. 01), and significantly lower in group B after the treatment than those in the other two groups (P〈0. 01 or 1). (15). Conclusion Lumbar parapharyngeal space in- jection of ozone has exact treatment effects in LDH patients, especially in the concentration of 40μg/ml.
作者 陈水林 王玮
出处 《华南国防医学杂志》 CAS 2014年第1期28-29,47,共3页 Military Medical Journal of South China
关键词 臭氧 椎旁间隙 腰椎间盘突出症 Ozone Lumbar parapharyngeal space Lumbar disc herniation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献157

共引文献200

同被引文献65

  • 1王晓红,何成奇,丁明甫,张黎明,韩梅,张艳明,蓝群.颈椎病治疗成绩评分表[J].华西医学,2005,20(2):232-233. 被引量:137
  • 2杨安礼,刘亮,姚勐炜,蔡珉巍,蔡丰.髓核低温消融联合臭氧注射术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的临床价值[J].实用临床医药杂志,2007,11(1):1-3. 被引量:5
  • 3Weinstein J N, Boden S D, An H. Emerging technology in spine: should we rethink the past or move forward in spite of the past[ J]. Spine, 2003, 28 ( 15 Suppl) :S1.
  • 4La Rosa G, Conti A, Cacciola F, et al. Pediele screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis : does posterior lum- bar interbody fusion improve outcome over posterolateral fusion [ J ]. J Neurosurg, 2003, 99 (2 Suppl) : 143-150.
  • 5Lidar Z, Beaumont A, Lifshutz J, et al. Clinical and radiological relationship between posterior lumbar inter- body fusion and posterolateral lumbar fusion [ J ]. Surg Neurol, 2005,64(4) :303-308.
  • 6Cole C D, Mccall T D, Schmidt M H, et al. Compari- son of low back fusion techniques : transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fu- sion ( PL1F ) approaches [ J ]. Curt Rev Musculoskelet Med, 2009, 2(2) : 118-126.
  • 7Vivek A. Mehta, Matthew J, et al. Trans-foraminal ver- sus posterior lumbarinterbody fusion: comparison of sur- gical morbidity [ J ]. Neurological Research, 2011,33 ( 1 ) :38-41.
  • 8Zenya I, Shiro I, Tokumi K, et al. Volumetric change in interbody bone graft after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) : a prospective study [ J ]. Eur Spine J, 2014, 23(10) :2144-2149.
  • 9田海军,陈德玉,卢旭华,何志敏,陈宇.腰椎融合手术方式的比较研究[J].脊柱外科杂志,2008,6(2):122-126. 被引量:3
  • 10付胜良,于方.等离子刀治疗腰椎间盘突出症疗效观察[J].山东医药,2008,48(32):103-104. 被引量:3

引证文献6

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部