摘要
目的了解大学生性别角色以及失恋应对方式的特点,探讨大学生性别角色对失恋应对方式的影响。方法以274名大学生为研究对象,采用大学生性别角色量表和大学生失恋应对方式问卷进行调查研究。结果未分化的大学生在攻击因子上显著高于其他性别角色大学生(F=13.159,P<0.001),在认知重建因子上显著低于其他性别角色大学生(F=11.465,P<0.001);未分化的大学生在逃避因子上显著高于双性化的大学生(F=5.425),在寻求转移因子上显著低于双性化大学生(F=3.943);女性化的大学生在情绪宣泄因子上显著高于其他性别角色大学生(F=6.728,P<0.01)。结论双性化的大学生应对方式积极,未分化大学生应对方式消极,女性化较多采用情绪宣泄的方式。
Objective To understand the characteristics of gender role and coping style for lovelorn undergraduates, and further explore the impact of gender role on coping style for lovelorn undergraduates. Methods A total of 274 college students were tested by new 50 - item sex role inventory for Chinese college students and questionnaire of the coping strategies for lovelorn undergraduates. Results Undifferentiated college students were significantly higher thanother gender role of college students on assaulting( F = 13. 159 ,P 〈 0. 001 ), and significantly lower oncognition rebuilding( F = 11. 465 ,P 〈 0. 001 ) ;Undifferentiated college students were significantly higher than the androgynous on evading ( F = 5. 425, P 〈 0.01 ), and significantly lower on searching substitute ( F = 3. 943, P 〈 0.01 ) ; Feminine college students were significantly higher than other gender role of college students on catharsis( F = 6. 728 ,P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion The more positive coping styles are used by the androgynous, the less negative styles;Undifferentiated college students are on the contrary. Feminine students are accustomed to catharsis.
出处
《中国健康心理学杂志》
2014年第2期255-257,共3页
China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词
性别角色
失恋
应对方式
大学生
社会心理
Gender roles
Lovelorn
Coping style
College students
Social psychology