期刊文献+

大学生性别角色对失恋应对方式的影响 被引量:2

The Impact of Gender Role on Coping Style for Lovelorn Undergraduates
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解大学生性别角色以及失恋应对方式的特点,探讨大学生性别角色对失恋应对方式的影响。方法以274名大学生为研究对象,采用大学生性别角色量表和大学生失恋应对方式问卷进行调查研究。结果未分化的大学生在攻击因子上显著高于其他性别角色大学生(F=13.159,P<0.001),在认知重建因子上显著低于其他性别角色大学生(F=11.465,P<0.001);未分化的大学生在逃避因子上显著高于双性化的大学生(F=5.425),在寻求转移因子上显著低于双性化大学生(F=3.943);女性化的大学生在情绪宣泄因子上显著高于其他性别角色大学生(F=6.728,P<0.01)。结论双性化的大学生应对方式积极,未分化大学生应对方式消极,女性化较多采用情绪宣泄的方式。 Objective To understand the characteristics of gender role and coping style for lovelorn undergraduates, and further explore the impact of gender role on coping style for lovelorn undergraduates. Methods A total of 274 college students were tested by new 50 - item sex role inventory for Chinese college students and questionnaire of the coping strategies for lovelorn undergraduates. Results Undifferentiated college students were significantly higher thanother gender role of college students on assaulting( F = 13. 159 ,P 〈 0. 001 ), and significantly lower oncognition rebuilding( F = 11. 465 ,P 〈 0. 001 ) ;Undifferentiated college students were significantly higher than the androgynous on evading ( F = 5. 425, P 〈 0.01 ), and significantly lower on searching substitute ( F = 3. 943, P 〈 0.01 ) ; Feminine college students were significantly higher than other gender role of college students on catharsis( F = 6. 728 ,P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion The more positive coping styles are used by the androgynous, the less negative styles;Undifferentiated college students are on the contrary. Feminine students are accustomed to catharsis.
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2014年第2期255-257,共3页 China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词 性别角色 失恋 应对方式 大学生 社会心理 Gender roles Lovelorn Coping style College students Social psychology
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献102

共引文献409

同被引文献36

  • 1郑全全,陈树林.中学生应激源量表的初步编制[J].心理发展与教育,1999,15(4):45-49. 被引量:59
  • 2严标宾,郑雪.大学生社会支持、自尊和主观幸福感的关系研究[J].心理发展与教育,2006,22(3):60-64. 被引量:311
  • 3ONeil J M. Patterns of gender role conflict and strain: Sexism and fearof femininity in men"s lives [ J]. Personnel and Guidance Journal,1981,60:203-210.
  • 4Addis M E, Mahalik J R. Men,masculinity,and the contexts of helpseeking[ J]. American psychologist ,2003 ,58:5-14.
  • 5Helgeson V S. The psychology of gender (2nd edition) [ M ]. UpperSaddle River,NJ;Prentice Hall,2005:64-64.
  • 6Schwartz J P. Gender - role conflict and self - esteem:factors associ-ated with partner abuse in court - referred men [ J ]. Psychology ofMen & Masculinity,2005,6(2) :109-113.
  • 7Baker K L,Robertson N,Connelly D. Men caring for wives or partnerswith dimentia:Masculinity,strain,and gain[ J]. Aging and MentalHealth,2010,14:319-327.
  • 8Fragoso J M, Kashubeck S. Machismo, Gender Role Conflict, andMental Health in Mexican American Men [ J ]. Psychology of Men andMasculinity. 2000,1 (2) :87-97.
  • 9Good G E,Robertson J M,O'Neil J M,et al. Male gender role con-flict :Psychometric issues and relations to psychological distress [ J ].Journal of Counseling Psychology,1995 ,42( 1 ) :3-3.
  • 10NguyenC M. Problem solving appraisal,gender role conflict,help -seeking behavior, and psychological distress among men who are home-less[ J]. Psychology of Men and Masculinity ,2012,13 :270-282.

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部